(Click on image to enlarge) Scroll down to read other stories in this edition. The entire edition of the First Capitol News including the ads can be found at firstcapitolnews.com. Daily breaking news is posted at firstcapitolnews-today.blogspot.com.
Saturday, December 02, 2006
FIRST CAPITOL NEWS FRONT PAGE DECEMBER 2, 2006
(Click on image to enlarge) Scroll down to read other stories in this edition. The entire edition of the First Capitol News including the ads can be found at firstcapitolnews.com. Daily breaking news is posted at firstcapitolnews-today.blogspot.com.
Major Winter Storm Hits Area
By Phyllis Schaltenbrand
A major winter storm hit the St. Charles area Thursday. After many hours of rain, sleet, and freezing snow the area was covered in several inches of snow.
Many St. Charles businesses did not open Thursday and some of those that did open closed early.
The St. Charles City Hall closed at 1:00 p.m. Thursday and was closed Friday. It is expected to reopen Monday Morning.
City crews worked through the day Thursday and into the night in an attempt to keep the city streets passable. By early Friday morning most of the main thoroughfares were passable. Many of the secondary streets and subdivision streets were still covered with several inches of ice topped by several inches of snow. Most city streets are expected to be passable by later Friday afternoon.
Because of icy conditions the Missouri State Highway Patrol closed several sections of Interstate 44 and Interstate 70 for several hours. Interstate 70 was reported to be extremely dangerous from Goodfellow Boulevard in St. Louis to Columbia, Missouri.
Many homes in the metropolitan area including areas of St. Charles were without power Friday morning. Several trees were uprooted and many power lines were down.
Ameren UE reported that in some areas is could be several days before they would be able to restore power.
Should you experience any power lines down please do not approach the lines but immediately notify 911.
A major winter storm hit the St. Charles area Thursday. After many hours of rain, sleet, and freezing snow the area was covered in several inches of snow.
Many St. Charles businesses did not open Thursday and some of those that did open closed early.
The St. Charles City Hall closed at 1:00 p.m. Thursday and was closed Friday. It is expected to reopen Monday Morning.
City crews worked through the day Thursday and into the night in an attempt to keep the city streets passable. By early Friday morning most of the main thoroughfares were passable. Many of the secondary streets and subdivision streets were still covered with several inches of ice topped by several inches of snow. Most city streets are expected to be passable by later Friday afternoon.
Because of icy conditions the Missouri State Highway Patrol closed several sections of Interstate 44 and Interstate 70 for several hours. Interstate 70 was reported to be extremely dangerous from Goodfellow Boulevard in St. Louis to Columbia, Missouri.
Many homes in the metropolitan area including areas of St. Charles were without power Friday morning. Several trees were uprooted and many power lines were down.
Ameren UE reported that in some areas is could be several days before they would be able to restore power.
Should you experience any power lines down please do not approach the lines but immediately notify 911.
ROBBERY
Robbery
On Monday, November 27, 2006 the Moto Mart located at 2801 North Highway 94 was held up.
At approximately 11:55 p.m. a male subject described as; white, 5’6” – 5” 10”, 140 to 160 pounds, approximately 25 years of age, bearing a black and red coat, black gloves, a black motorcycle helmet, black scarf covering part of his face with a pale complexion and blue or green eyes entered the store.
He implied he had a weapon but did not display one. He announced a robbery and then exited the store with a small amount of cash.
The robbery suspect left on a dark colored motorcycle going southbound on Highway 94. There were no reported injuries.
On Monday, November 27, 2006 the Moto Mart located at 2801 North Highway 94 was held up.
At approximately 11:55 p.m. a male subject described as; white, 5’6” – 5” 10”, 140 to 160 pounds, approximately 25 years of age, bearing a black and red coat, black gloves, a black motorcycle helmet, black scarf covering part of his face with a pale complexion and blue or green eyes entered the store.
He implied he had a weapon but did not display one. He announced a robbery and then exited the store with a small amount of cash.
The robbery suspect left on a dark colored motorcycle going southbound on Highway 94. There were no reported injuries.
Filing for Two Seats on the St. Charles School Board of Education Opens on December 12th.
Filing for Two Seats on the St. Charles School Board of Education Opens on December 12th.
Qualified candidates for the Board of Education may file for office beginning at 8:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 12, 2006. Individuals may file at the District’s Administrative Offices, 1025 Country Club Road, St. Charles, Missouri 63303 Filing hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. on Friday. The District’s Administrative offices will be closed December 22, 2006 through January 5, 2007. Filing will not take place if the district is closed due to inclement weather. Candidates may file for one of two, three-year terms. The deadline for filing is 5:00 p.m. on January 16, 2007.
Bernie Weinrich and Donna Towers acurrently holding the seats up for election
Members of the Board of Education shall be citizens of the United States and resident taxpayers of the St. Charles School District. They shall also have resided in the state for one (1) year preceding their election or appointment. Members shall be at least 24 years of age.
All Board members should have knowledge of and an interest in the welfare and educational opportunities of students.
Board members initially elected or appointed after August 28, 1993, in addition to the other qualifications listed in this policy, are required by law to successfully complete orientation and training requirements within one (1) year of the date of the election or appointment. The orientation and training shall consist of at least 16 hours with the cost of such training to be paid by the district. All programs providing the orientation and training required under the provisions of this section shall be offered by a statewide association organized for the benefit of members of Boards of Education or be approved by the State Board of Education.
A Board member is a “public servant” under the Missouri Criminal Code provisions regarding bribery, acceding to corruption, official misconduct and misuse of official information.
A “taxpayer” is an individual who has paid taxes to the state or any subdivision thereof within the immediately preceding 12-month period, or the spouse of such individual.
Qualified candidates for the Board of Education may file for office beginning at 8:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 12, 2006. Individuals may file at the District’s Administrative Offices, 1025 Country Club Road, St. Charles, Missouri 63303 Filing hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. on Friday. The District’s Administrative offices will be closed December 22, 2006 through January 5, 2007. Filing will not take place if the district is closed due to inclement weather. Candidates may file for one of two, three-year terms. The deadline for filing is 5:00 p.m. on January 16, 2007.
Bernie Weinrich and Donna Towers acurrently holding the seats up for election
Members of the Board of Education shall be citizens of the United States and resident taxpayers of the St. Charles School District. They shall also have resided in the state for one (1) year preceding their election or appointment. Members shall be at least 24 years of age.
All Board members should have knowledge of and an interest in the welfare and educational opportunities of students.
Board members initially elected or appointed after August 28, 1993, in addition to the other qualifications listed in this policy, are required by law to successfully complete orientation and training requirements within one (1) year of the date of the election or appointment. The orientation and training shall consist of at least 16 hours with the cost of such training to be paid by the district. All programs providing the orientation and training required under the provisions of this section shall be offered by a statewide association organized for the benefit of members of Boards of Education or be approved by the State Board of Education.
A Board member is a “public servant” under the Missouri Criminal Code provisions regarding bribery, acceding to corruption, official misconduct and misuse of official information.
A “taxpayer” is an individual who has paid taxes to the state or any subdivision thereof within the immediately preceding 12-month period, or the spouse of such individual.
THE CITY DESK - Rory Riddler, Councilman Ward 1
Middle East Reality Check:
Is Democracy, Without The Guarantee Of Religious Freedom & Individual Rights, Worth Fighting For?
Earlier this year, the Pope ignited protests when he dared to point out the writings of a scholar from the Renaissance who had criticized the extremist teachings of Islamic sects. As if to say, “We’ll show you whom to call extreme,” tens of thousands of Islamic fundamentalists, in countries as far away as Indonesia took to the streets, burned the Pope in effigy and screamed themselves silly.
This week the Pope left Rome to visit Turkey. It was a diplomatic and public relations visit to help soothe the easily ruffled feathers of some Muslims. One of the sites on the Pontiffs top ten list of things to do and see in Turkey was to visit the Hague Sophia in Istanbul.
Istanbul was formerly Constantinople, the capitol city of the Western Roman and Byzantine Empires. The Hague Sophia is truly one of the wonders of the ancient world. It is a massive multi-domed Church that dominates the city’s skyline. I say Church because that is why it was built. It was built by Christians for Christians.
But when Constantinople fell to the invading Turks it was quickly converted to a Mosque.
That hasn’t bothered me very much over the years. It all happened a long time ago. I don’t often go around thinking, gee, when are we going to organize another crusade and kick those Muslims out of our holy sites? But I get the impression that some Muslims think about that a lot.
Here was the Pope about to visit the Hague Sophia and the news reported that radical Muslim clerics were warning people that if the Pope tried to offer a prayer or make the sign of the cross in their Mosque, blood would flow in the streets. It must be all that caffeine in the Turkish coffee.
Tolerance is something we take for granted in this country and most of the Western World. I remember being abhorred to learn last year that a man in Afghanistan was being tried as a criminal for converting to Christianity. This is after we supposedly freed the country from the intolerant Taliban extremists and they elected their own government. Fortunately, the more “moderate” government just had the man declared insane for wanting to practice a religion of his own choosing. Not like the bad old days when they would have stoned him to death.
Which brings me to one of the main points of this week’s column. Democracy without the safeguards of a Bill of Rights isn’t worth fighting for. Freedom isn’t just the right to vote for leaders, it’s the protection of the inalienable rights held by each of us. It is about a Bill of Rights that protect us not from the excesses of despots, but from the excesses of our own democratically elected government.
The people of Iraq and Afghanistan don’t have that same protection of their civil liberties. Over half of their population, the women of these emerging democracies, aren’t even guaranteed the same rights as men. There is no freedom of religion…only the officially sanctioned State religion. Why should Iraqis fight and die for their own country, when that nation does not respect nor guarantee their rights as individuals?
At the end of World War II the United States imposed a government on occupied Germany and Japan. It included both democracy and a Bill of Rights. Guess what? Those ideals flourished. We knew what worked, but instead we deposed a secular, but cruel dictatorship in Iraq and then twiddled our thumbs as they created a fundamentalist regime answerable to religious extremists.
Frankly, I have had it with the terminal stupidity that passes for U. S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East and feel we need to debunk myths that seem to have been invented simply to justify bad decisions. I’m not talking about rehashing why we went to war. The justification, or lack of it, to have invested thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of our tax dollars doesn’t deal with the problem at hand.
The fact is that we have no business being in the middle of someone else’s civil war. We probably should have partitioned the country from the beginning. At least the Kurds in the North (the ones not trying to kill us) would have loved us for giving them their own nation. But we were too afraid Turkey might get mad because they have spent the last five hundred years or so killing Kurds in their own country. This is, of course, the same Turkish government who wouldn’t let our troops invade Iraq from the North at the start of the war even though they were suppose to be our ally.
What I’m challenging are the premises and strategy with which we continue to engage our enemies. Not just in Iraq, but anywhere.
Laws protecting individual and religious freedom, must be imposed. As I have already stated (but it is worth repeating till somebody in Washington gets it) democracy without the protections we enjoy in the Bill of Rights, is not worth fighting for. When you supposedly “win” (and I use that term loosely) a war, you get to “impose” a few rules. If individuals in Iraq and Afghanistan had individual liberty, they might feel more like fighting to defend those rights and not just the esoteric notion that they can cast a ballot once every few years.
When the radicalized Muslims take to the streets any time someone prints a cartoon or questions why someone would behead innocent civilians in the name of God, I would like to see more world leaders stand up and tell them how wrong they are…not apologize that we live in freedom loving nations where people have a right to draw cartoons or voice an opinion. Jump up and down all day in the hot sun screaming your heads off. We no longer care that you are so easily offended.
Finally, let’s never forget that there are ten good people in the Muslim world for every one who wants to kill us or blow up innocent civilians. But they need to hold their own people accountable, not have them idolized 24/7 on an Arab television network. They need to encourage capitalism and economic reforms that will give their young people jobs, careers and hope. For those without work or hope, radical fundamentalism becomes their only life and only hope.
These are tough issues I know. But we either have to change the rules and start playing the game on our terms, or risk losing to people so intolerant they don’t want to share the planet with anyone who doesn’t think exactly like they do. I’m rooting for the silent majority of Muslims to take back their religion from the radicals. When the Pope is allowed to say a prayer in the Hague Sophia, I will know that day has arrived.
Is Democracy, Without The Guarantee Of Religious Freedom & Individual Rights, Worth Fighting For?
Earlier this year, the Pope ignited protests when he dared to point out the writings of a scholar from the Renaissance who had criticized the extremist teachings of Islamic sects. As if to say, “We’ll show you whom to call extreme,” tens of thousands of Islamic fundamentalists, in countries as far away as Indonesia took to the streets, burned the Pope in effigy and screamed themselves silly.
This week the Pope left Rome to visit Turkey. It was a diplomatic and public relations visit to help soothe the easily ruffled feathers of some Muslims. One of the sites on the Pontiffs top ten list of things to do and see in Turkey was to visit the Hague Sophia in Istanbul.
Istanbul was formerly Constantinople, the capitol city of the Western Roman and Byzantine Empires. The Hague Sophia is truly one of the wonders of the ancient world. It is a massive multi-domed Church that dominates the city’s skyline. I say Church because that is why it was built. It was built by Christians for Christians.
But when Constantinople fell to the invading Turks it was quickly converted to a Mosque.
That hasn’t bothered me very much over the years. It all happened a long time ago. I don’t often go around thinking, gee, when are we going to organize another crusade and kick those Muslims out of our holy sites? But I get the impression that some Muslims think about that a lot.
Here was the Pope about to visit the Hague Sophia and the news reported that radical Muslim clerics were warning people that if the Pope tried to offer a prayer or make the sign of the cross in their Mosque, blood would flow in the streets. It must be all that caffeine in the Turkish coffee.
Tolerance is something we take for granted in this country and most of the Western World. I remember being abhorred to learn last year that a man in Afghanistan was being tried as a criminal for converting to Christianity. This is after we supposedly freed the country from the intolerant Taliban extremists and they elected their own government. Fortunately, the more “moderate” government just had the man declared insane for wanting to practice a religion of his own choosing. Not like the bad old days when they would have stoned him to death.
Which brings me to one of the main points of this week’s column. Democracy without the safeguards of a Bill of Rights isn’t worth fighting for. Freedom isn’t just the right to vote for leaders, it’s the protection of the inalienable rights held by each of us. It is about a Bill of Rights that protect us not from the excesses of despots, but from the excesses of our own democratically elected government.
The people of Iraq and Afghanistan don’t have that same protection of their civil liberties. Over half of their population, the women of these emerging democracies, aren’t even guaranteed the same rights as men. There is no freedom of religion…only the officially sanctioned State religion. Why should Iraqis fight and die for their own country, when that nation does not respect nor guarantee their rights as individuals?
At the end of World War II the United States imposed a government on occupied Germany and Japan. It included both democracy and a Bill of Rights. Guess what? Those ideals flourished. We knew what worked, but instead we deposed a secular, but cruel dictatorship in Iraq and then twiddled our thumbs as they created a fundamentalist regime answerable to religious extremists.
Frankly, I have had it with the terminal stupidity that passes for U. S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East and feel we need to debunk myths that seem to have been invented simply to justify bad decisions. I’m not talking about rehashing why we went to war. The justification, or lack of it, to have invested thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of our tax dollars doesn’t deal with the problem at hand.
The fact is that we have no business being in the middle of someone else’s civil war. We probably should have partitioned the country from the beginning. At least the Kurds in the North (the ones not trying to kill us) would have loved us for giving them their own nation. But we were too afraid Turkey might get mad because they have spent the last five hundred years or so killing Kurds in their own country. This is, of course, the same Turkish government who wouldn’t let our troops invade Iraq from the North at the start of the war even though they were suppose to be our ally.
What I’m challenging are the premises and strategy with which we continue to engage our enemies. Not just in Iraq, but anywhere.
Laws protecting individual and religious freedom, must be imposed. As I have already stated (but it is worth repeating till somebody in Washington gets it) democracy without the protections we enjoy in the Bill of Rights, is not worth fighting for. When you supposedly “win” (and I use that term loosely) a war, you get to “impose” a few rules. If individuals in Iraq and Afghanistan had individual liberty, they might feel more like fighting to defend those rights and not just the esoteric notion that they can cast a ballot once every few years.
When the radicalized Muslims take to the streets any time someone prints a cartoon or questions why someone would behead innocent civilians in the name of God, I would like to see more world leaders stand up and tell them how wrong they are…not apologize that we live in freedom loving nations where people have a right to draw cartoons or voice an opinion. Jump up and down all day in the hot sun screaming your heads off. We no longer care that you are so easily offended.
Finally, let’s never forget that there are ten good people in the Muslim world for every one who wants to kill us or blow up innocent civilians. But they need to hold their own people accountable, not have them idolized 24/7 on an Arab television network. They need to encourage capitalism and economic reforms that will give their young people jobs, careers and hope. For those without work or hope, radical fundamentalism becomes their only life and only hope.
These are tough issues I know. But we either have to change the rules and start playing the game on our terms, or risk losing to people so intolerant they don’t want to share the planet with anyone who doesn’t think exactly like they do. I’m rooting for the silent majority of Muslims to take back their religion from the radicals. When the Pope is allowed to say a prayer in the Hague Sophia, I will know that day has arrived.
Case In Point By Joe Koester, Councilman Ward 9
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”
Martin Luther King, Jr.
On a recent trip to Austria the damaged reputation of The United States abroad was made quite clear by the attitudes of our European cousins. The United States is now seen in a light of suspicion and most average Europeans hold a measure of contempt for our government.
Some Americans say, “Who cares?” But there are serious consequences for us when we decide to go it alone and leave our allies behind. Namely, our country bears the brunt of casualties and we bear the greatest portion of actual financial cost too. Furthermore, our businesses find a more hostile atmosphere in which to operate and make deals. A negative image abroad harms our companies’ abilities to compete.
The Europeans are not happy about our fall from grace – they appreciate the role that our country played in WWII and they appreciate the role that we played as a stabilizing force for the past 50 or so years. The Europeans want to support an America that they remember from years past – a beacon of hope for peace and human rights for all peoples of the globe. They yearn for an America that is fighting for the underdog and standing up to injustice for the sake of doing what’s right and not because we are trying to help Exxon-Mobile shore up its reserves. Not one European nation wants the role the US holds and they do not want to see us lose pole position either. They simply want an America that they can cheer for and trust. One gentleman put it this way, “We could understand that you elected Bush the first time, you didn’t know better, but to reelect him made Europeans ask, “What are the Americans thinking?” I would argue that Bush lost the first race by more than 500,000 votes and the second election was so tainted by scandal in several states, especially Ohio, that it is indeterminable whether or not we Americans did in fact “re-elect” Mr. Bush. But, with that aside...
Most Europeans are quite capable of keeping the people of a land and the government of a land separate. They understand that politics doesn’t always equate society at large.
Again, our allies want us to lead. They want us to lead while holding high the banner of justice. Europeans still praise President Clinton for tackling genocide and violence in the Balkans and admit that it was they who should have taken care of the matter in their own back yard. But, it was we who sent troops and did the work – our veterans whom we are all so proud of. Their mission was clear and our soldiers did what the European forces were apparently incapable or unwilling to do – enforce our collective pledge to never again allow genocide (on Western Soil).
I know that America’s military can accomplish most any mission that they are handed as long as they know what the goal is. This is no difference for anyone who is at college; starting a business; working for a dream – they have to know what they are shooting for and not simply wandering in the wilderness in order to achieve their goals. Every American stands proudly behind our men and women of the Armed Forces for bravery and loyalty.
Our nation has grown tired of senseless loss of lives. It was the administration who had no game plan for our soldiers, and it was this administration that holds all blame for current troubles that they failed to plan for.
As scripture says, “Our people perish for lack of vision.”
County Executive Receives Prestigious East-West Gateway ‘Chairman’s Award’
County Executive Receives Prestigious East-West Gateway ‘Chairman’s Award’
The East-West Gateway Council of Governments presented St. Charles County Executive Joe Ortwerth with its prestigious Chairman’s Award at the organization’s annual meeting and award ceremony at the Millennium Hotel in St. Louis on November 17, 2006. The Chairman’s Award is a rarely bestowed honor given to individuals who have made extraordinary contributions to the St. Louis region.
While delivering the award, EWGCG Chairman Les Sterman recognized Ortwerth’s contributions during his time as County Executive and also his service as a member of the Missouri House of Representatives.
According to Sterman, the award is given to “individuals who recognize that their responsibilities as elected officials go beyond the boundaries of their own jurisdiction. They engage thoughtfully and passionately in regional issues, even though they may get little political benefit at home from doing so.” Sterman also referred to County Executive Ortwerth as a straight shooter who never shrinks from difficult subjects and will always share his honest opinion.
Joe Ortwerth served 12 years in the state legislature and became St. Charles County Executive in 1995. He has served on the EWG Board of Directors for many years, on the Blue Ribbon Panel of the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission and was the leading proponent of the Page Avenue bridge project. County Executive Ortwerth is a strong proponent of ethics in government and is a respected steward of taxpayer dollars. After 12 years as St. Charles County Executive, Mr. Ortwerth is retiring to private life, leaving a fiscally sound government in place for the residents of St. Charles County and his mark on the metropolitan region as a leader of character, integrity and foresight.
The East-West Gateway Council of Governments presented St. Charles County Executive Joe Ortwerth with its prestigious Chairman’s Award at the organization’s annual meeting and award ceremony at the Millennium Hotel in St. Louis on November 17, 2006. The Chairman’s Award is a rarely bestowed honor given to individuals who have made extraordinary contributions to the St. Louis region.
While delivering the award, EWGCG Chairman Les Sterman recognized Ortwerth’s contributions during his time as County Executive and also his service as a member of the Missouri House of Representatives.
According to Sterman, the award is given to “individuals who recognize that their responsibilities as elected officials go beyond the boundaries of their own jurisdiction. They engage thoughtfully and passionately in regional issues, even though they may get little political benefit at home from doing so.” Sterman also referred to County Executive Ortwerth as a straight shooter who never shrinks from difficult subjects and will always share his honest opinion.
Joe Ortwerth served 12 years in the state legislature and became St. Charles County Executive in 1995. He has served on the EWG Board of Directors for many years, on the Blue Ribbon Panel of the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission and was the leading proponent of the Page Avenue bridge project. County Executive Ortwerth is a strong proponent of ethics in government and is a respected steward of taxpayer dollars. After 12 years as St. Charles County Executive, Mr. Ortwerth is retiring to private life, leaving a fiscally sound government in place for the residents of St. Charles County and his mark on the metropolitan region as a leader of character, integrity and foresight.
COMMENTS & COMMENTARY by Charles Hill
In the past I have always tried to stay somewhat neutral in the politics of St. Charles. The recent filing date for Mayor of St. Charles has closed and there are three very distinct candidates.
Mayor Patti York has proven that vindictive politics takes a toll on the city. York actively campaigned against council members running for re-election, she and her family supported the re-call efforts on two sitting council members. She went as far to allow Glennon Jamboritz to use her building’s address when applying for a business license and then diverted City funds to fictitious businesses until it got to him.
Leadership is difficult, real leaders work with people not against them. Now she is trying to distance herself from the problems she has caused. My understanding is this paper is going to wrap up the year with top stories. My hope is the top story highlighted is the Mayor’s letter to the City of St. Louis regarding her support of Tommy Mayer the police officer who ordered the City Administrator on the ground at gunpoint. At the time the city was being sued by Sergeant Mayer, York told the police chief of the City of St. Louis Mayer was right and the city should loose.
Former Mayor Grace Nichols who is retired and acts as a fill in for Judges who miss work. Nichols’s claim to fame is that she is the Mayor who bought the “Goldenrod Showboat” to St. Charles. Nichols tenure also brought the “miniature museum” to Main Street. Keep in mind both these are no longer here and cost the city a tremendous amount of money.
Councilman John Gieseke, Ward 8. John has been the most outspoken when it comes to making sure the residents of St. Charles are placed first. John helped clean up York and Nichol’s messes. He voted to sell the miniature museum building to Tony’s on Main and lead the fight to rid the City’s taxpayers of having to support the failed Goldenrod. All in all he has proven to be one of the few to realize the city is a business not a personal pocket book for the rich and famous.
This isn’t an endorsement but this election is very important. You have to ask this very simple question, like a person or not, who has the drive to move this city forward. I know that I usually write about Main Street I do believe that the current direction hasn’t worked well; I believe the old ways of the Goldenrod and Miniature Museum didn’t work. It’s up to you to determine what direction you want this city to grow and go.
Mayor Patti York has proven that vindictive politics takes a toll on the city. York actively campaigned against council members running for re-election, she and her family supported the re-call efforts on two sitting council members. She went as far to allow Glennon Jamboritz to use her building’s address when applying for a business license and then diverted City funds to fictitious businesses until it got to him.
Leadership is difficult, real leaders work with people not against them. Now she is trying to distance herself from the problems she has caused. My understanding is this paper is going to wrap up the year with top stories. My hope is the top story highlighted is the Mayor’s letter to the City of St. Louis regarding her support of Tommy Mayer the police officer who ordered the City Administrator on the ground at gunpoint. At the time the city was being sued by Sergeant Mayer, York told the police chief of the City of St. Louis Mayer was right and the city should loose.
Former Mayor Grace Nichols who is retired and acts as a fill in for Judges who miss work. Nichols’s claim to fame is that she is the Mayor who bought the “Goldenrod Showboat” to St. Charles. Nichols tenure also brought the “miniature museum” to Main Street. Keep in mind both these are no longer here and cost the city a tremendous amount of money.
Councilman John Gieseke, Ward 8. John has been the most outspoken when it comes to making sure the residents of St. Charles are placed first. John helped clean up York and Nichol’s messes. He voted to sell the miniature museum building to Tony’s on Main and lead the fight to rid the City’s taxpayers of having to support the failed Goldenrod. All in all he has proven to be one of the few to realize the city is a business not a personal pocket book for the rich and famous.
This isn’t an endorsement but this election is very important. You have to ask this very simple question, like a person or not, who has the drive to move this city forward. I know that I usually write about Main Street I do believe that the current direction hasn’t worked well; I believe the old ways of the Goldenrod and Miniature Museum didn’t work. It’s up to you to determine what direction you want this city to grow and go.
FIRST CAPITOL COUNSELING BY DR. HOWARD ROSENTHAL
Simple test reveals if you are obsessive about the holidays
Dr. Howard Rosenthal
You just might be obsessive about the holidays. Do you have thoughts that completely occupy your mind about experiencing the perfect holiday season? Take this dynamite little test I’ve created and get instant feedback about your personality. Okay, here goes:
If your family decorated your Christmas tree or Hanukkah bush and you secretly snuck back in the middle of the night while the family slept to make sure each ornament was picture perfect then you just might be obsessive.
If you dusted your home a second time while standing on a step stool because a few tall people might be visiting your home for a holiday gathering . . . well, you just might be obsessive about the holidays.
If you shopped at a dozen stores to get the cheapest price on a holiday gift and then returned it because you saw the item for 39 cents less on the Internet, you just might be obsessive. (By the way, does the word “postage” ring a holiday bell here?)
If you wolfed down a prophylactic dose of statin drugs and a handful of antioxidant vitamins before eating your turkey dinner, for fear that your cholesterol might shoot up a point, you just might be obsessive.
If you built your last snowman using a bubble level then you just might be obsessive. (It’s also called a spirit level, but believe me when I say that this behavior isn’t remotely related to a healthy spirit of the holidays.)
On the other hand, if you give your Uncle Henry the same bottle of Hai- Karate Cologne with rust particles on the metal cap that he gave you as a gift in 1967 when the product was released, you just might not be obsessive. Just keep doing what you are doing.
Here’s to a great obsession free holiday season.
Dr. Howard Rosenthal is Professor and Program Coordinator of Human Services at St. Louis Community College at Florissant Valley and a multi-book author. His website is www.howardrosenthal.com. Copyright Howard Rosenthal 2006.
THE View From The Cheap Seats BY Jerry Haferkamp
The View from the Cheap Seats
By Jerry Haferkamp
A few weeks ago I wrote that I would mention campaign finance monkey business after the candidates filed for the mayoral position. Here is something of interest to a few of you.
In the last campaign for mayor, a campaign committee whose address happened to be the same as Mayor York’s residence donated $2,300 to the Citizens For a Responsible Community. This committee then did a mailing supporting Mayor York. It wouldn’t look good if the mailings were from her promoting herself. This made it look like she had some outside the home support. One would think that this would, for all intents and purposes, qualify the CFRC as a campaign committee. “So what”, you ask?
The revised Missouri statutes forbid a campaign committee to give or receive contributions under a fictitious name. Both the CFRC (receiver) and the Citizens to Elect Patti York (giver) would be considered fictitious entities. The CFRC is registered with the State, but I couldn’t find a registration for Citizens to Elect Patti York.
So, when the elections get here, vote for the status quo. Our mayor has brought many “firsts” to our city. The first mayor to have a recall petition circulated against her. The first mayor known to sign contracts without council approval as required. The first mayor to actively campaign to remove a council member who wouldn’t bow to her whims. The first mayor to need a “legal defense fund”. The first mayor to thumb her nose at ordinances the rest of us would be fined for, like boarded up windows on her property on Main. The first mayor to support fraud in the recall process. (You remember her comment: It doesn’t matter how they got the signatures…they have them) What a class act!
Vote to continue the status quo. You know I will. Yeah, right!
It seems the mayor of O’Fallon knows how to keep troublemakers at bay. The City of O’Fallon has just given Carl Maus, head stirrer of the pot at CFRC, a nice paying job as a “liaison” between the mayor and the council. Around $50 grand a year for what? O’Fallon needs a “liaison”? Donna dear, please keep him there. CFRC has caused enough trouble in St. Charles and St. Peters. But look out Wentzville. It looks like they’re headed west.
Has anyone seen charges filed by our local prosecutor concerning the person who handed over to election officials petitions that were known (according to sworn depositions) to be fraudulent? I didn’t think so. Don’t expect one either. It’s not like they were trying to steal your car. It was only your government they were interested in stealing. If he can just get me to stop mentioning it, you will forget and it will all just go away. He was the only unopposed candidate that I didn’t vote for. It was a matter of principles. Some of us still have them. As you can see in the paragraphs above, some don’t.
I’m confident that you will be showing yours when it comes time to vote for a new mayor.
That’s today’s view from the cheap seats.
By Jerry Haferkamp
A few weeks ago I wrote that I would mention campaign finance monkey business after the candidates filed for the mayoral position. Here is something of interest to a few of you.
In the last campaign for mayor, a campaign committee whose address happened to be the same as Mayor York’s residence donated $2,300 to the Citizens For a Responsible Community. This committee then did a mailing supporting Mayor York. It wouldn’t look good if the mailings were from her promoting herself. This made it look like she had some outside the home support. One would think that this would, for all intents and purposes, qualify the CFRC as a campaign committee. “So what”, you ask?
The revised Missouri statutes forbid a campaign committee to give or receive contributions under a fictitious name. Both the CFRC (receiver) and the Citizens to Elect Patti York (giver) would be considered fictitious entities. The CFRC is registered with the State, but I couldn’t find a registration for Citizens to Elect Patti York.
So, when the elections get here, vote for the status quo. Our mayor has brought many “firsts” to our city. The first mayor to have a recall petition circulated against her. The first mayor known to sign contracts without council approval as required. The first mayor to actively campaign to remove a council member who wouldn’t bow to her whims. The first mayor to need a “legal defense fund”. The first mayor to thumb her nose at ordinances the rest of us would be fined for, like boarded up windows on her property on Main. The first mayor to support fraud in the recall process. (You remember her comment: It doesn’t matter how they got the signatures…they have them) What a class act!
Vote to continue the status quo. You know I will. Yeah, right!
It seems the mayor of O’Fallon knows how to keep troublemakers at bay. The City of O’Fallon has just given Carl Maus, head stirrer of the pot at CFRC, a nice paying job as a “liaison” between the mayor and the council. Around $50 grand a year for what? O’Fallon needs a “liaison”? Donna dear, please keep him there. CFRC has caused enough trouble in St. Charles and St. Peters. But look out Wentzville. It looks like they’re headed west.
Has anyone seen charges filed by our local prosecutor concerning the person who handed over to election officials petitions that were known (according to sworn depositions) to be fraudulent? I didn’t think so. Don’t expect one either. It’s not like they were trying to steal your car. It was only your government they were interested in stealing. If he can just get me to stop mentioning it, you will forget and it will all just go away. He was the only unopposed candidate that I didn’t vote for. It was a matter of principles. Some of us still have them. As you can see in the paragraphs above, some don’t.
I’m confident that you will be showing yours when it comes time to vote for a new mayor.
That’s today’s view from the cheap seats.
FIRST CAPITOL NEWS SPORTS - MIKE McMurran Sports Editor
As much as I personally like high school football, it is somewhat difficult not to get excited about the upcoming high school basketball season here in beautiful Saint Charles City. All three schools located inside the City limits, West, High and Duchesne are receiving statewide media attention. Both Saint Charles public schools are ranked in the top-twenty of regional large schools (enrollment over 1000) while Duchesne sits at #4 in the small school poll. The sad thing about all of this is only one of three, and maybe not even one, will escape from the district tournament in February (see related article).
Each local team returns a bonafide superstar and candidate for all-state honors. Duchesne returns second-team All-Metro guard Zach Plackemeier, who as a junior averaged 23.3 points, 4.2 rebounds, 4.1 assists and 2.1 steals per contest, hitting fifty-six 3-pointers while leading Duchesne to a 23-4 record and their first district title in decades. Plackemeier has already signed to play college ball at Indiana-Purdue University at Fort Wayne.
While Duchesne’s strength looks to be their outside shooting, the Pirates of Saint Charles High will be looking to the inside and their big man, literally speaking, Josh Harrellson. Josh, a Western Illinois signee, averaged 18.1 points, 11 boards and 3.4 blocks per game last season as he lead the Pirates to a 21 win season. The 6’8” senior center didn’t start playing basketball until junior high and has slowly, yet surely, turned into one of the dominant big men in the region. It will be interesting to see just how big his numbers will be this season.
While Harrellson didn’t start playing basketball until junior high, West’s Kramer Soderberg has been bouncing the ball since he learned how to walk. It certainly helps that Kramer’s dad is St. Louis University basketball coach Brad Soderberg, which explains his basketball savvy – but the tag of “Brad Soderberg’s son” is passé. Make no bones about it, Kramer can play the game like few others. In just his junior season he averaged 23 points, 4.8 assists, 3.3 rebounds and 1.4 steals per contest as he led the Warriors to a 20-7 record and the GAC North title. Like Plackemeier, Soderberg hit 56 3-pointers, while nailing 162 free throws – most of which came in the 4th quarter.
As bad as the past football season was in Saint Charles, and it was one of the worst seasons in recent history, the basketball season looks to be one of the very brightest.
While on the subject of basketball, the very first FCN High School Athlete of the Week, Jeff Coffey, of St. Charles West, has walked on and made the roster of Soderberg’s Billikens. Coffey, a 6’3” guard, epitomizes what a dream and hard work can accomplish. Congratulations Jeff, you have made your family, your school and your entire community proud.
And lastly, I’ve received a number of inquiries as to whether or not I was serious about running for the Saint Charles City Council. Yes, I am as serious as I can be. Politics has been a passion of mine for many, many years. As a child I can remember pondering over election results for hours, looking for any type of voting pattern I could find. Prior to moving to beautiful Saint Charles, I was elected to the City Council, and ultimately the mayor of Country Club Hills, MO. This past week I picked up the packet from the City Clerk’s office and plan on submitting all the paper work on Monday, January 9th. While in City Hall I was approached by an anonymous individual who asked: “Hey, aren’t you that sports guy from the First Capitol News?” To which I responded, “Why yes I am. Thank you for recognizing me. By the way, which ward do you live in?” Spoken like a true candidate.
mcmurran@charter.net/314.280.9189
High School Basketball
VERY HOT HARDWOOD
Six Big Teams In – Only One Team Will Survive to go to State
By Louis J. Launer
It could be a massive train wreck in high school basketball when February rolls around.
This year’s Class 4 District 7 tournament, which will be hosted at St. Charles High School, has includes defending state champion St. Francis Borgia, Duchesne, St. Charles, St. Charles West, Pacific and St. Dominic. To many fans and experts along the way, this district could become home of a next state champion. Although there is a lot of championship-caliber talent in all of the schools mentioned, only one team will have to emerge out of this district to see any postseason action.
Many are predicting that Borgia could be that team. But others say that St. Charles West has fielded one of their best teams since their state championship in 1995. Kramer Soderberg (the son of St. Louis University head basketball coach Steve Soderberg) is leading the Warriors this year. Soderberg continues to average 20 points per game and is 40 percent from the free-throw line. Also for St. Charles West, watch for Brian Maurer and sophomore Alex Bazzell to help out Soderberg. Jeff Ellis, a 6’4½” forward can also pull some surprises. Ellis is a transfer from Sherman, Texas.
But don’t count out Duchesne, where their 23-4 season in 2005-06 turned some heads. They are just as potent as St. Charles West and Borgia. Senior Zack Plackemeier will lead Duchesne for a second year. Plackemeier signed a letter of intent to play at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. Last season, he averaged 23.3 points a game as a junior. Guards Dan Friedel and Brandon Durk, who round out a Duchesne team, that match the might of St. Charles West and even St. Charles, will join Plackemeier.
St. Charles High School has a senior star in Josh Harrellson. Harrellson just signed a letter of intent to play at Western Illinois University. This year, he will concentrate on the Pirates as they try to get out of the shadows of St. Charles West and Duchesne, as well as St. Francis Borgia. Joining Harrellson with the Pirates is 6’10” Belgian exchange student Dean Dillen. Rudy Harper and guard K.J. Rufkahr round out the Pirates on their road to what has become a very intense basketball season.
ST. CHARLES WEST 74, ST. CHARLES 71 (OT) – You could not find a parking space anywhere on the St. Charles West campus the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. In their traditional Thanksgiving eve season opener for both schools, the Pirates dominated the first half, but made the fatal mistake of not finishing off the Warriors. They paid the price in overtime.
Soderberg led St. Charles West in setting up the scores. Soderberg had 21 points in the game. But Josh Harrellson had several good shots from the three-point circle. The game had to go into overtime and St. Charles West outlasted St. Charles High in the never-ending cross-town rivalry. The victory by St. Charles West and the close outcome is a sign that this will be one of the most exciting basketball seasons this year.
Each local team returns a bonafide superstar and candidate for all-state honors. Duchesne returns second-team All-Metro guard Zach Plackemeier, who as a junior averaged 23.3 points, 4.2 rebounds, 4.1 assists and 2.1 steals per contest, hitting fifty-six 3-pointers while leading Duchesne to a 23-4 record and their first district title in decades. Plackemeier has already signed to play college ball at Indiana-Purdue University at Fort Wayne.
While Duchesne’s strength looks to be their outside shooting, the Pirates of Saint Charles High will be looking to the inside and their big man, literally speaking, Josh Harrellson. Josh, a Western Illinois signee, averaged 18.1 points, 11 boards and 3.4 blocks per game last season as he lead the Pirates to a 21 win season. The 6’8” senior center didn’t start playing basketball until junior high and has slowly, yet surely, turned into one of the dominant big men in the region. It will be interesting to see just how big his numbers will be this season.
While Harrellson didn’t start playing basketball until junior high, West’s Kramer Soderberg has been bouncing the ball since he learned how to walk. It certainly helps that Kramer’s dad is St. Louis University basketball coach Brad Soderberg, which explains his basketball savvy – but the tag of “Brad Soderberg’s son” is passé. Make no bones about it, Kramer can play the game like few others. In just his junior season he averaged 23 points, 4.8 assists, 3.3 rebounds and 1.4 steals per contest as he led the Warriors to a 20-7 record and the GAC North title. Like Plackemeier, Soderberg hit 56 3-pointers, while nailing 162 free throws – most of which came in the 4th quarter.
As bad as the past football season was in Saint Charles, and it was one of the worst seasons in recent history, the basketball season looks to be one of the very brightest.
While on the subject of basketball, the very first FCN High School Athlete of the Week, Jeff Coffey, of St. Charles West, has walked on and made the roster of Soderberg’s Billikens. Coffey, a 6’3” guard, epitomizes what a dream and hard work can accomplish. Congratulations Jeff, you have made your family, your school and your entire community proud.
And lastly, I’ve received a number of inquiries as to whether or not I was serious about running for the Saint Charles City Council. Yes, I am as serious as I can be. Politics has been a passion of mine for many, many years. As a child I can remember pondering over election results for hours, looking for any type of voting pattern I could find. Prior to moving to beautiful Saint Charles, I was elected to the City Council, and ultimately the mayor of Country Club Hills, MO. This past week I picked up the packet from the City Clerk’s office and plan on submitting all the paper work on Monday, January 9th. While in City Hall I was approached by an anonymous individual who asked: “Hey, aren’t you that sports guy from the First Capitol News?” To which I responded, “Why yes I am. Thank you for recognizing me. By the way, which ward do you live in?” Spoken like a true candidate.
mcmurran@charter.net/314.280.9189
High School Basketball
VERY HOT HARDWOOD
Six Big Teams In – Only One Team Will Survive to go to State
By Louis J. Launer
It could be a massive train wreck in high school basketball when February rolls around.
This year’s Class 4 District 7 tournament, which will be hosted at St. Charles High School, has includes defending state champion St. Francis Borgia, Duchesne, St. Charles, St. Charles West, Pacific and St. Dominic. To many fans and experts along the way, this district could become home of a next state champion. Although there is a lot of championship-caliber talent in all of the schools mentioned, only one team will have to emerge out of this district to see any postseason action.
Many are predicting that Borgia could be that team. But others say that St. Charles West has fielded one of their best teams since their state championship in 1995. Kramer Soderberg (the son of St. Louis University head basketball coach Steve Soderberg) is leading the Warriors this year. Soderberg continues to average 20 points per game and is 40 percent from the free-throw line. Also for St. Charles West, watch for Brian Maurer and sophomore Alex Bazzell to help out Soderberg. Jeff Ellis, a 6’4½” forward can also pull some surprises. Ellis is a transfer from Sherman, Texas.
But don’t count out Duchesne, where their 23-4 season in 2005-06 turned some heads. They are just as potent as St. Charles West and Borgia. Senior Zack Plackemeier will lead Duchesne for a second year. Plackemeier signed a letter of intent to play at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. Last season, he averaged 23.3 points a game as a junior. Guards Dan Friedel and Brandon Durk, who round out a Duchesne team, that match the might of St. Charles West and even St. Charles, will join Plackemeier.
St. Charles High School has a senior star in Josh Harrellson. Harrellson just signed a letter of intent to play at Western Illinois University. This year, he will concentrate on the Pirates as they try to get out of the shadows of St. Charles West and Duchesne, as well as St. Francis Borgia. Joining Harrellson with the Pirates is 6’10” Belgian exchange student Dean Dillen. Rudy Harper and guard K.J. Rufkahr round out the Pirates on their road to what has become a very intense basketball season.
ST. CHARLES WEST 74, ST. CHARLES 71 (OT) – You could not find a parking space anywhere on the St. Charles West campus the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. In their traditional Thanksgiving eve season opener for both schools, the Pirates dominated the first half, but made the fatal mistake of not finishing off the Warriors. They paid the price in overtime.
Soderberg led St. Charles West in setting up the scores. Soderberg had 21 points in the game. But Josh Harrellson had several good shots from the three-point circle. The game had to go into overtime and St. Charles West outlasted St. Charles High in the never-ending cross-town rivalry. The victory by St. Charles West and the close outcome is a sign that this will be one of the most exciting basketball seasons this year.
Saturday, November 18, 2006
FEDERAL GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS ST. CHARLES CITY RECORDS
Including Records of Illegal Signing Of Express Scripts Contract By Mayor York
By Tony Brockmeyer
The First Capitol News has learned that a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena has been served on the City of St. Charles asking for City records including the records of the illegal signing of a contract with Express Scripts by Mayor York. (see Illegal Contract Draws Fire, February 5, 2005; By 10-0 Vote City Council Initiates An Investigation Into The Unauthorized Signing of Insurance Contract By Mayor, February 26, 2005; Unauthorized Signing Of Contract By Mayor Could result In Her Impeachment, Council To Hold Hearings Subpoena Witnesses, March 19, 2005; Mayor Attempts To Mislead Residents, April 9, 2005; Hearing Regarding Mayor’s Alleged Illegal Signing of Contract Will Be Held May 4th at 6pm, April 30, 2005; Kneemiller, Reese, Weller Refuse To Vote For Subpoenas In Hearing On Alleged Illegal Signing Of Contract By Mayor York, May 7, 2005; Express Scripts Demands $200,000 from City - Mayor York Signed Contract Without Council Approval, May 13, 2006; all can be found at ..
firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com) Minutes of the meetings can be found in the records at St. Charles City Hall.
We have also learned that the City Council has approved an expenditure of approximately $25,000 that was used to hire a private attorney to make sure that the City complies with the subpoena in the proper fashion.
Because of the Fifth Amendment, the federal legal system has to use grand juries to bring charges, at least for certain offenses. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires charges for all capital and “infamous” crimes be brought by an indictment returned by a grand jury. The amendment has been interpreted to require that an indictment be used to charge federal felonies, unless a defendant waives his or her right to be indicted by a grand jury. The Supreme Court has held that this part of the Fifth Amendment is not binding on the states, so they can use grand juries or not, as they wish.
If a defendant waives his or her right to be indicted by a grand jury, the prosecutor can charge them by using an “information.” An information is simply a pleading that accuses the defendants of committing crimes, just as an indictment does. The difference between an indictment and an information is that a grand jury must approve an indictment, while a prosecutor can issue an information without the grand jury’s approval or, for that matter, without ever showing the information to the grand jury.
Since most federal prosecutions involve felony charges, grand juries play an important role in enforcing federal criminal law.
Federal grand juries are composed of between 16 and 23 individuals. Sixteen is the minimum and 23 is the maximum number that can constitute a federal grand jury.
Since grand jury proceedings are secret, grand juries meet in private, which means they usually meet in areas that are not accessible to the public. Federal grand juries meet in special “grand jury rooms” that are located in generally out of the way areas of a federal courthouse. Grand juries use subpoenas to gather the evidence they need to use in deciding whether crimes have been committed. They can subpoena documents and physical evidence and they can subpoena witnesses to testify.
In the federal system, grand juries are more likely to hear testimony from federal agents than from police officers, but they do sometimes hear from police officers, as well. They are most likely to hear from police officers when they are investigating, drug trafficking or corruption in local government.
In the federal system, witnesses cannot be accompanied into the grand jury room by their attorney.
Since witnesses have not been indicted, they have no constitutional right to counsel, since the Sixth Amendment right to counsel only applies after someone has been indicted
When it comes to a federal grand jury subpoena, U.S. attorneys, the federal government’s chief prosecutors, can convene grand juries to present evidence to indict someone for a crime. In a grand jury proceeding, there are no judges or defense attorneys. The U.S. attorneys present evidence and call and question witnesses in front of the jury. The jurors do not reach a verdict of guilty or innocent, but vote on whether the evidence and witnesses presented support the indictment sought by the federal prosecutor.
Several elected officials refused to comment citing the secrecy proceedings of a grand jury.
Since the proceedings of grand juries are secret, we were unable to obtain any further information regarding the subpoena served on the City of St. Charles.
By Tony Brockmeyer
The First Capitol News has learned that a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena has been served on the City of St. Charles asking for City records including the records of the illegal signing of a contract with Express Scripts by Mayor York. (see Illegal Contract Draws Fire, February 5, 2005; By 10-0 Vote City Council Initiates An Investigation Into The Unauthorized Signing of Insurance Contract By Mayor, February 26, 2005; Unauthorized Signing Of Contract By Mayor Could result In Her Impeachment, Council To Hold Hearings Subpoena Witnesses, March 19, 2005; Mayor Attempts To Mislead Residents, April 9, 2005; Hearing Regarding Mayor’s Alleged Illegal Signing of Contract Will Be Held May 4th at 6pm, April 30, 2005; Kneemiller, Reese, Weller Refuse To Vote For Subpoenas In Hearing On Alleged Illegal Signing Of Contract By Mayor York, May 7, 2005; Express Scripts Demands $200,000 from City - Mayor York Signed Contract Without Council Approval, May 13, 2006; all can be found at ..
firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com) Minutes of the meetings can be found in the records at St. Charles City Hall.
We have also learned that the City Council has approved an expenditure of approximately $25,000 that was used to hire a private attorney to make sure that the City complies with the subpoena in the proper fashion.
Because of the Fifth Amendment, the federal legal system has to use grand juries to bring charges, at least for certain offenses. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires charges for all capital and “infamous” crimes be brought by an indictment returned by a grand jury. The amendment has been interpreted to require that an indictment be used to charge federal felonies, unless a defendant waives his or her right to be indicted by a grand jury. The Supreme Court has held that this part of the Fifth Amendment is not binding on the states, so they can use grand juries or not, as they wish.
If a defendant waives his or her right to be indicted by a grand jury, the prosecutor can charge them by using an “information.” An information is simply a pleading that accuses the defendants of committing crimes, just as an indictment does. The difference between an indictment and an information is that a grand jury must approve an indictment, while a prosecutor can issue an information without the grand jury’s approval or, for that matter, without ever showing the information to the grand jury.
Since most federal prosecutions involve felony charges, grand juries play an important role in enforcing federal criminal law.
Federal grand juries are composed of between 16 and 23 individuals. Sixteen is the minimum and 23 is the maximum number that can constitute a federal grand jury.
Since grand jury proceedings are secret, grand juries meet in private, which means they usually meet in areas that are not accessible to the public. Federal grand juries meet in special “grand jury rooms” that are located in generally out of the way areas of a federal courthouse. Grand juries use subpoenas to gather the evidence they need to use in deciding whether crimes have been committed. They can subpoena documents and physical evidence and they can subpoena witnesses to testify.
In the federal system, grand juries are more likely to hear testimony from federal agents than from police officers, but they do sometimes hear from police officers, as well. They are most likely to hear from police officers when they are investigating, drug trafficking or corruption in local government.
In the federal system, witnesses cannot be accompanied into the grand jury room by their attorney.
Since witnesses have not been indicted, they have no constitutional right to counsel, since the Sixth Amendment right to counsel only applies after someone has been indicted
When it comes to a federal grand jury subpoena, U.S. attorneys, the federal government’s chief prosecutors, can convene grand juries to present evidence to indict someone for a crime. In a grand jury proceeding, there are no judges or defense attorneys. The U.S. attorneys present evidence and call and question witnesses in front of the jury. The jurors do not reach a verdict of guilty or innocent, but vote on whether the evidence and witnesses presented support the indictment sought by the federal prosecutor.
Several elected officials refused to comment citing the secrecy proceedings of a grand jury.
Since the proceedings of grand juries are secret, we were unable to obtain any further information regarding the subpoena served on the City of St. Charles.
Conventional Wisdom The Big Loser On Election Day
By Tony Brockmeyer
Looking at the results of the November 2006 general elections. It appears that the big loser was conventional wisdom.
Conventional wisdom before an election, is those statements that so called political experts make trying to gaze into a crystal ball to predict the results.
Both before and after an election the political spin doctors are working overtime trying to imprint their unique brand of partisian politics on the race for results. The First Capitol News would like to look at a couple of conventional wisdom nugget's that we feel faired particularly bad this election cycle.
The first of these is the conventional wisdom that St. Charles County is “solidly” Republican. In fact, our voters are remarkably independent when given good candidates to vote for. Remember this was a county where Ross Perot received 39 percent in his first bid for President. That was the highest percentage he received in any county in Missouri.
Attorney General Jay Nixon, Democrat, has consistently carried St. Charles County by a good margin. This is a fact most Republican political pundits would like you to ignore. It is also the reason Jay Nixon is the odds on favorite to be Missouri’s next Governor.
In a recent column by would-be pundit John Sonderreger, he was again pressing the point that because most County offices were retained by Republican candidates, the county was still heavily Republican. This is pure wishful thinking on John’s part given the actual results. Not only did Democratic County Council members Joe McCulloch and Cheryl Hibbler retain their seats against strong and well funded Republican challengers, but several Republican held State Representative seats were too close to call until the wee hours of the morning.
Chief among these was Ken Bierman in the 17th District. This Orchard Farm school board member, running for the first time as a Democratic candidate against an opponent with 10 times the money he had to spend, came within one tenth of one percent of winning the upset of the year. Democrat Tom Green was locked in a close battle with State Representative Sally Faith who edged him one point nine percent. St. Charles City Councilman Joe Koester kept Majority Floor leader Representative Tom Dempsey biting his nails until the last results were in. Koester captured 47.17 percent of the vote in a district the Republicans thought was one of their safest to retain. He too was at a disadvantage in fund raising. Dempsey had hundreds of thousands of dollars at his command and still was forced to scramble and put out negative mailers against Joe Koester as late as two days before the election.
Claire McCaskill, despite a relentless barrage of negative mailers, television ads and electronic phone calls, all attacking her family, finances and credibility, managed to reduce Senator Talent’s previous winning margin in St. Charles County.
Talent received 4,000 less votes county-wide then he did the last time he was on the ballot. Keeping the race close in St. Charles County contributed heavily to McCaskill’s overall win. She may also have been helped by the stem cell initiative, which despite a spirited campaign by religious organizations targeted to this County, ended the night in a virtual tie among county voters.
Locally there were examples of the upset of conventional wisdom on two issues. The first of these was proposition A. While narrowly missing their required 4/7th’s mark it carried a majority of 55 percent of City voters. Councilman Mike Weller had predicted that voters south of Interstate 70 would oppose the measure because of the proposed site of the Community Center would be perceived as too far to go. Voters south of Interstate 70 approved of the issue 55.8 percent compared with the approval north of 70 of 54.6 percent of voters. In other words, people south of 70 were even more in support than those north punching a huge hole in Weller’s theory. Likewise Councilman Bob Hoepfner, who campaigned heavily against the proposal going so far as to arrange to send electronic phone calls to leave his recorded message on answering machines throughout the City and running ads in other publications. But when it came time to count the ballots at Hanover, in his area, gave the measure over 60 percent support. The highest precinct support was Montclair where it received a 60.79 percent approval.
The Council had promised voters that the issue would be on the ballot and supporters of a community center consider this vote as giving them a mandate to move forward. The issue will receive further study and refinement over the next four or five months. Expect to see a community center project on the drawing boards before too long.
Finally there is the issue of the Mayor’s salary. Tuesday night the spin doctors were really trying to explain away the will of the voters. Councilwoman Dottie Greer stated that her voters were “confused” and somehow unable to figure out the issue. This same sentiment was echoed by the Mayor. Councilman Mike Weller, who supports a high salary for the next mayor, stood by his position though he admitted that it was out of step with the message from voters. Councilman Bob Hoepfner, who had originally wanted to pay the new Mayor $150,000 per year, was strangely silent during the debate Tuesday night. At least he had less of a problem understanding what the voters meant when they voted down the highest pay range by over 80 percent.
Council members Rory Riddler and Mark Brown both pointed out that had the issue of retaining the current form of government being placed on the ballot as they had proposed, the voters likely would have overturned the previous narrow vote in favor of this radical change in government. Councilman John Gieseke, who has announced his bid for mayor, told the First Capitol News, that he will recuse himself on any vote relative to what the city should pay it’s next mayor.
Conventional wisdom among the movers and shakers has been that the Mayor’s salary must be at least $120,000. That prediction along with most of what passes for conventional wisdom in St. Charles county politics was turned on its head by the voters on November 7th.
Looking at the results of the November 2006 general elections. It appears that the big loser was conventional wisdom.
Conventional wisdom before an election, is those statements that so called political experts make trying to gaze into a crystal ball to predict the results.
Both before and after an election the political spin doctors are working overtime trying to imprint their unique brand of partisian politics on the race for results. The First Capitol News would like to look at a couple of conventional wisdom nugget's that we feel faired particularly bad this election cycle.
The first of these is the conventional wisdom that St. Charles County is “solidly” Republican. In fact, our voters are remarkably independent when given good candidates to vote for. Remember this was a county where Ross Perot received 39 percent in his first bid for President. That was the highest percentage he received in any county in Missouri.
Attorney General Jay Nixon, Democrat, has consistently carried St. Charles County by a good margin. This is a fact most Republican political pundits would like you to ignore. It is also the reason Jay Nixon is the odds on favorite to be Missouri’s next Governor.
In a recent column by would-be pundit John Sonderreger, he was again pressing the point that because most County offices were retained by Republican candidates, the county was still heavily Republican. This is pure wishful thinking on John’s part given the actual results. Not only did Democratic County Council members Joe McCulloch and Cheryl Hibbler retain their seats against strong and well funded Republican challengers, but several Republican held State Representative seats were too close to call until the wee hours of the morning.
Chief among these was Ken Bierman in the 17th District. This Orchard Farm school board member, running for the first time as a Democratic candidate against an opponent with 10 times the money he had to spend, came within one tenth of one percent of winning the upset of the year. Democrat Tom Green was locked in a close battle with State Representative Sally Faith who edged him one point nine percent. St. Charles City Councilman Joe Koester kept Majority Floor leader Representative Tom Dempsey biting his nails until the last results were in. Koester captured 47.17 percent of the vote in a district the Republicans thought was one of their safest to retain. He too was at a disadvantage in fund raising. Dempsey had hundreds of thousands of dollars at his command and still was forced to scramble and put out negative mailers against Joe Koester as late as two days before the election.
Claire McCaskill, despite a relentless barrage of negative mailers, television ads and electronic phone calls, all attacking her family, finances and credibility, managed to reduce Senator Talent’s previous winning margin in St. Charles County.
Talent received 4,000 less votes county-wide then he did the last time he was on the ballot. Keeping the race close in St. Charles County contributed heavily to McCaskill’s overall win. She may also have been helped by the stem cell initiative, which despite a spirited campaign by religious organizations targeted to this County, ended the night in a virtual tie among county voters.
Locally there were examples of the upset of conventional wisdom on two issues. The first of these was proposition A. While narrowly missing their required 4/7th’s mark it carried a majority of 55 percent of City voters. Councilman Mike Weller had predicted that voters south of Interstate 70 would oppose the measure because of the proposed site of the Community Center would be perceived as too far to go. Voters south of Interstate 70 approved of the issue 55.8 percent compared with the approval north of 70 of 54.6 percent of voters. In other words, people south of 70 were even more in support than those north punching a huge hole in Weller’s theory. Likewise Councilman Bob Hoepfner, who campaigned heavily against the proposal going so far as to arrange to send electronic phone calls to leave his recorded message on answering machines throughout the City and running ads in other publications. But when it came time to count the ballots at Hanover, in his area, gave the measure over 60 percent support. The highest precinct support was Montclair where it received a 60.79 percent approval.
The Council had promised voters that the issue would be on the ballot and supporters of a community center consider this vote as giving them a mandate to move forward. The issue will receive further study and refinement over the next four or five months. Expect to see a community center project on the drawing boards before too long.
Finally there is the issue of the Mayor’s salary. Tuesday night the spin doctors were really trying to explain away the will of the voters. Councilwoman Dottie Greer stated that her voters were “confused” and somehow unable to figure out the issue. This same sentiment was echoed by the Mayor. Councilman Mike Weller, who supports a high salary for the next mayor, stood by his position though he admitted that it was out of step with the message from voters. Councilman Bob Hoepfner, who had originally wanted to pay the new Mayor $150,000 per year, was strangely silent during the debate Tuesday night. At least he had less of a problem understanding what the voters meant when they voted down the highest pay range by over 80 percent.
Council members Rory Riddler and Mark Brown both pointed out that had the issue of retaining the current form of government being placed on the ballot as they had proposed, the voters likely would have overturned the previous narrow vote in favor of this radical change in government. Councilman John Gieseke, who has announced his bid for mayor, told the First Capitol News, that he will recuse himself on any vote relative to what the city should pay it’s next mayor.
Conventional wisdom among the movers and shakers has been that the Mayor’s salary must be at least $120,000. That prediction along with most of what passes for conventional wisdom in St. Charles county politics was turned on its head by the voters on November 7th.
Hodaks Win Judgement Of Over $1 Million From St. Peters & Former Mayor Tom Brown
By Phyllis Schaltenbrand
Late Tuesday, in the Federal Appeals Court of the Eastern District of Missouri, a verdict of $375,000 was returned against the City of St. Peters and a verdict of $1 million was returned against former St. Peter’s Mayor Tom Brown in favor of Brian and Karla Hodak who had operated a bar and restaurant in St. Peters.
In 2004, the Hodaks’ filed a federal lawsuit against the City of St. Peters, its former Mayor Tom Brown, and several officers of the City’s police department. The Hodaks claimed the City and Tom Brown violated their due process rights and their first amendment rights by revoking the Bar’s license. Brian Hodak also claimed his civil rights were violated by City police officers when they arrested him in October 2001 for assault and resisting arrest.
On March 14, 2006 a jury In United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri decided in favor of the Hodaks and against the City of St. Peters, Tom Brown, Sergeant Timothy Kaiser, Officer Charles Cason and Officer Robert Treadway.
On July 26, 2006, U.S. District Court Judge E. Richard Webber entered his order reversing the jury verdict against the City of St. Peters, Tom Brown and the above listed police officers.
In rulings made earlier this year, Judge Webber dismissed the Hodak’s claim that their due process rights were violated by the City’s revocation of their liquor license. At that time, Judge Webber also dismissed Brian Hodak’s claims against City police officers that he was falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted. A jury trial was conduced on the only remaining claims, that the Hodaks’ first amendment rights were violated by the City in retaliation for Brian Hodak’s public criticism of the City and Mayor Tom Brown, and that Brian Hodak’s civil rights were violated by City police officers using excessive force against him in effecting his arrest for assault and resisting arrest.
Following the 6-day trial in March 2006, the jury returned a verdict exonerating the actions of the City’s police officers on Mr. Hodak’s claims. After the evidence was closed, the City requested the Court dismiss the Hodaks’ only other claim-the retaliation claim-because the Hodaks failed to present any evidence showing the City violated their constitutional rights.
After return of the jury’s verdict, the City renewed its request to dismiss. Judge Webber agreed with the City and ordered a new trial on the retaliation claim set to begin October 30, 2006. In his Order, Judge Webber also denied Hodaks’ requests for attorney fees and for a reversal of the jury verdict exonerating the police officers.
The City has always maintained that its actions and the actions of its police officers did not violate anyone’s constitutional rights. The City vigorously defended the lawsuit from the beginning and welcomed a jury trial on the claims. Judge Webber’s order is a further confirmation of the City’s position it has maintained throughout this lawsuit.
The First Capitol News contacted Karla Hodak shortly after the verdict was released. Ms. Hodak referred all inquiries to their attorney who did not return any of our calls.
Late Tuesday, in the Federal Appeals Court of the Eastern District of Missouri, a verdict of $375,000 was returned against the City of St. Peters and a verdict of $1 million was returned against former St. Peter’s Mayor Tom Brown in favor of Brian and Karla Hodak who had operated a bar and restaurant in St. Peters.
In 2004, the Hodaks’ filed a federal lawsuit against the City of St. Peters, its former Mayor Tom Brown, and several officers of the City’s police department. The Hodaks claimed the City and Tom Brown violated their due process rights and their first amendment rights by revoking the Bar’s license. Brian Hodak also claimed his civil rights were violated by City police officers when they arrested him in October 2001 for assault and resisting arrest.
On March 14, 2006 a jury In United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri decided in favor of the Hodaks and against the City of St. Peters, Tom Brown, Sergeant Timothy Kaiser, Officer Charles Cason and Officer Robert Treadway.
On July 26, 2006, U.S. District Court Judge E. Richard Webber entered his order reversing the jury verdict against the City of St. Peters, Tom Brown and the above listed police officers.
In rulings made earlier this year, Judge Webber dismissed the Hodak’s claim that their due process rights were violated by the City’s revocation of their liquor license. At that time, Judge Webber also dismissed Brian Hodak’s claims against City police officers that he was falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted. A jury trial was conduced on the only remaining claims, that the Hodaks’ first amendment rights were violated by the City in retaliation for Brian Hodak’s public criticism of the City and Mayor Tom Brown, and that Brian Hodak’s civil rights were violated by City police officers using excessive force against him in effecting his arrest for assault and resisting arrest.
Following the 6-day trial in March 2006, the jury returned a verdict exonerating the actions of the City’s police officers on Mr. Hodak’s claims. After the evidence was closed, the City requested the Court dismiss the Hodaks’ only other claim-the retaliation claim-because the Hodaks failed to present any evidence showing the City violated their constitutional rights.
After return of the jury’s verdict, the City renewed its request to dismiss. Judge Webber agreed with the City and ordered a new trial on the retaliation claim set to begin October 30, 2006. In his Order, Judge Webber also denied Hodaks’ requests for attorney fees and for a reversal of the jury verdict exonerating the police officers.
The City has always maintained that its actions and the actions of its police officers did not violate anyone’s constitutional rights. The City vigorously defended the lawsuit from the beginning and welcomed a jury trial on the claims. Judge Webber’s order is a further confirmation of the City’s position it has maintained throughout this lawsuit.
The First Capitol News contacted Karla Hodak shortly after the verdict was released. Ms. Hodak referred all inquiries to their attorney who did not return any of our calls.
Express Scripts Files Suit Against City
By Phyllis Schaltenbrand
On November 7, 2006 in St. Charles County Circuit Court Express Scripts, Inc. filed suit against the City of St. Charles.
In their suit, Express Scripts alleges that on or about June 22, 2004, Express Scripts and Defendant City entered into a written contract entitled “Prescription Drug Program Agreement” and that they have fully performed all of their obligation to the City in accordance with the term and conditions of the Agreement. The Agreement was for a period of three years from June 22, 2004 until June 22, 2007. The City purported termination of the Agreement effective January 31, 2005 and that this was a material breach and has caused Express Scripts to incur damages for which the City is liable. In their suit Express Scripts alleges damages in excess of $25,000.
This matter relates to a contract that Mayor York signed with Express Scripts without City Council approval and in violation of the City Charter and Ordinances. The matter was being investigated by the City Council until a number of Council members refused to issue subpoenas to obtain the information.
The First Capitol News has learned that in October a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena was served on the City demanding records involving this transaction. (see related story on page one of this edition)
In an executive session, Tuesday evening, the City Council approved funding to hire a special attorney to defend the City in this suit.
Prior to filing suit Express Scripts had made written demand on the City for $200,000 in damages.
For additional information regarding the illegal signing of the contract with Express Scripts by the Mayor please see our archives at; firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com
(Illegal Contract Draws Fire, February 5, 2005; By 10-0 Vote City Council Initiates An Investigation Into The Unauthorized Signing of Insurance Contract By Mayor, February 26, 2005; Unauthorized Signing Of Contract By Mayor Could result In Her Impeachment, Council To Hold Hearings Subpoena Witnesses, March 19, 2005; Mayor Attempts To Mislead Residents, April 9, 2005; Hearing Regarding Mayor’s Alleged Illegal Signing of Contract Will Be Held May 4th at 6pm, April 30, 2005; Kneemiller, Reese, Weller Refuse To Vote For Subpoenas In Hearing On Alleged Illegal Signing Of Contract By Mayor York, May 7, 2005; Express Scripts Demands $200,000 from City - Mayor York Signed Contract Without Council Approval, May 13, 2006; all can be found at firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com)
On November 7, 2006 in St. Charles County Circuit Court Express Scripts, Inc. filed suit against the City of St. Charles.
In their suit, Express Scripts alleges that on or about June 22, 2004, Express Scripts and Defendant City entered into a written contract entitled “Prescription Drug Program Agreement” and that they have fully performed all of their obligation to the City in accordance with the term and conditions of the Agreement. The Agreement was for a period of three years from June 22, 2004 until June 22, 2007. The City purported termination of the Agreement effective January 31, 2005 and that this was a material breach and has caused Express Scripts to incur damages for which the City is liable. In their suit Express Scripts alleges damages in excess of $25,000.
This matter relates to a contract that Mayor York signed with Express Scripts without City Council approval and in violation of the City Charter and Ordinances. The matter was being investigated by the City Council until a number of Council members refused to issue subpoenas to obtain the information.
The First Capitol News has learned that in October a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena was served on the City demanding records involving this transaction. (see related story on page one of this edition)
In an executive session, Tuesday evening, the City Council approved funding to hire a special attorney to defend the City in this suit.
Prior to filing suit Express Scripts had made written demand on the City for $200,000 in damages.
For additional information regarding the illegal signing of the contract with Express Scripts by the Mayor please see our archives at; firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com
(Illegal Contract Draws Fire, February 5, 2005; By 10-0 Vote City Council Initiates An Investigation Into The Unauthorized Signing of Insurance Contract By Mayor, February 26, 2005; Unauthorized Signing Of Contract By Mayor Could result In Her Impeachment, Council To Hold Hearings Subpoena Witnesses, March 19, 2005; Mayor Attempts To Mislead Residents, April 9, 2005; Hearing Regarding Mayor’s Alleged Illegal Signing of Contract Will Be Held May 4th at 6pm, April 30, 2005; Kneemiller, Reese, Weller Refuse To Vote For Subpoenas In Hearing On Alleged Illegal Signing Of Contract By Mayor York, May 7, 2005; Express Scripts Demands $200,000 from City - Mayor York Signed Contract Without Council Approval, May 13, 2006; all can be found at firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com)
RAMBLING WITH THE EDITOR - Tony Brockmeyer
LET THE GAMES BEGIN
Filing for the office of Mayor has not yet closed but the games have already begun. The Convention and Visitors Bureau requested approval from the City Council for two advertising contracts with two television stations to advertise Christmas Traditions on South Main Street. The contracts with Channel 30 and with Channel 2, two of the least watched stations in the area, were for over $25,000 each. What is interesting about the contracts is that both called for live interviews with the Mayor. Do you think the Convention and Visitors Bureau thought an interview with the Mayor on television would increase the number of visitors to Christmas Traditions? Or do you think the CVB was playing up to the Mayor by giving her television coverage, paid for by the taxpayers, so she would have an advantage over the other two candidates in the February primary mayoral election in which she is an announced candidate? The Mayor has shown in the past that she is not above using taxpayer funds to promote herself or to attempt to crush her adversaries. Charles Hill mentions in his article that the local restaurants will have to do $5 million in business to recover the $50,000 that was approved. The businesses on South Main Street probably should order in additional merchandise so it is available for the large influx of visitors they will have because the Mayor is being interviewed on television.
LIONEL I WOULD BE CAREFUL
I hope Lionel, the mayor’s husband, reads the story about the judgment of $1 million against former St. Peters Mayor Tom Brown and $375,000 against the City. The Hodaks claimed the Mayor was attempting to put them out of business because of letters they were writing to the newspaper. This verdict and judgment sure gives us some ideas.
What brings this home is Midwest Waste has told us Lionel has called and visited their offices in an attempt to have them stop advertising in the First Capitol News. We also know of other businesses that have been contacted in attempts to stop their advertising in our publication. A Main Street merchant told us he was told by the publicist for Hot Summer Nights that the Mayor would not patronize his establishment because he was advertising in this paper and if he wanted her business he would have to write her a letter of apology. He told us his advertising in our newspaper brought him more business than the mayor ever could and he thought it was disgusting that the person who was supposed to be the community leader was using such tactics.
BOB SAYS HE IS YOUR CHAMPION BUT THINKS YOU ARE HIS CHUMPS
Councilman Bob Hoepfner wants you to believe that he is the champion of rights for the taxpayers and the fiscal watchdog for the city. He even had us believing that for a while, until we learned otherwise. Bob wants you to believe he is your champion while all along he believes you are his chumps. He is interested in what is good for Bob not what is best for the taxpayers. He spouts his rhetoric but while out of the public eye his actions speak otherwise.
Bob was against allowing Michael Sellenschuetter to hook his development (outside the city limits) onto city water and sewers. Then suddenly he changed his vote. I am sure it was not because he got the plumbing on several homes in the development. He was against allowing TR Hughes to hook up his development (outside the city limits) onto city water and sewers but then changed his vote. I am sure the fact that TR Hughes workers performed several thousand dollars work at his home had nothing to do with that. Those are just a couple of examples. Others can be found in our archives at firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com.
During the past election campaign, thousands of recorded telephone calls went out to city voters from Bob encouraging them to vote against the Community Center proposal. Caller ID indicated the calls were from Survey St. Louis. That is the company owned by Thomas Smith, Legislative Director for State Representative Tom Dempsey (R) 18th District.
Smith is the subject of an investigative report by the First Capitol News where it was found that he was the treasurer of more than 10 Republican Legislative District Committees.
As treasurer of these committees, Smith collected and disbursed several million dollars to various candidates as well as to businesses owned by him. See our archives, firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com and in the search area type in MONEY LAUNDERING.
Smith was also a member of the St. Charles Park Board and when his term expired and the Council would not approve his reappointment by the Mayor, he refused to step down. Hoepfner was against the reappointment of Smith, I wonder if he will vote for his reappointment now. Smith was also heavily involved in the attempts to recall Councilman Mark Brown and Councilman Dottie Greer. Both attempts were plagued with fraud, forgeries and misrepresentation.
Filing for the office of Mayor has not yet closed but the games have already begun. The Convention and Visitors Bureau requested approval from the City Council for two advertising contracts with two television stations to advertise Christmas Traditions on South Main Street. The contracts with Channel 30 and with Channel 2, two of the least watched stations in the area, were for over $25,000 each. What is interesting about the contracts is that both called for live interviews with the Mayor. Do you think the Convention and Visitors Bureau thought an interview with the Mayor on television would increase the number of visitors to Christmas Traditions? Or do you think the CVB was playing up to the Mayor by giving her television coverage, paid for by the taxpayers, so she would have an advantage over the other two candidates in the February primary mayoral election in which she is an announced candidate? The Mayor has shown in the past that she is not above using taxpayer funds to promote herself or to attempt to crush her adversaries. Charles Hill mentions in his article that the local restaurants will have to do $5 million in business to recover the $50,000 that was approved. The businesses on South Main Street probably should order in additional merchandise so it is available for the large influx of visitors they will have because the Mayor is being interviewed on television.
LIONEL I WOULD BE CAREFUL
I hope Lionel, the mayor’s husband, reads the story about the judgment of $1 million against former St. Peters Mayor Tom Brown and $375,000 against the City. The Hodaks claimed the Mayor was attempting to put them out of business because of letters they were writing to the newspaper. This verdict and judgment sure gives us some ideas.
What brings this home is Midwest Waste has told us Lionel has called and visited their offices in an attempt to have them stop advertising in the First Capitol News. We also know of other businesses that have been contacted in attempts to stop their advertising in our publication. A Main Street merchant told us he was told by the publicist for Hot Summer Nights that the Mayor would not patronize his establishment because he was advertising in this paper and if he wanted her business he would have to write her a letter of apology. He told us his advertising in our newspaper brought him more business than the mayor ever could and he thought it was disgusting that the person who was supposed to be the community leader was using such tactics.
BOB SAYS HE IS YOUR CHAMPION BUT THINKS YOU ARE HIS CHUMPS
Councilman Bob Hoepfner wants you to believe that he is the champion of rights for the taxpayers and the fiscal watchdog for the city. He even had us believing that for a while, until we learned otherwise. Bob wants you to believe he is your champion while all along he believes you are his chumps. He is interested in what is good for Bob not what is best for the taxpayers. He spouts his rhetoric but while out of the public eye his actions speak otherwise.
Bob was against allowing Michael Sellenschuetter to hook his development (outside the city limits) onto city water and sewers. Then suddenly he changed his vote. I am sure it was not because he got the plumbing on several homes in the development. He was against allowing TR Hughes to hook up his development (outside the city limits) onto city water and sewers but then changed his vote. I am sure the fact that TR Hughes workers performed several thousand dollars work at his home had nothing to do with that. Those are just a couple of examples. Others can be found in our archives at firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com.
During the past election campaign, thousands of recorded telephone calls went out to city voters from Bob encouraging them to vote against the Community Center proposal. Caller ID indicated the calls were from Survey St. Louis. That is the company owned by Thomas Smith, Legislative Director for State Representative Tom Dempsey (R) 18th District.
Smith is the subject of an investigative report by the First Capitol News where it was found that he was the treasurer of more than 10 Republican Legislative District Committees.
As treasurer of these committees, Smith collected and disbursed several million dollars to various candidates as well as to businesses owned by him. See our archives, firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com and in the search area type in MONEY LAUNDERING.
Smith was also a member of the St. Charles Park Board and when his term expired and the Council would not approve his reappointment by the Mayor, he refused to step down. Hoepfner was against the reappointment of Smith, I wonder if he will vote for his reappointment now. Smith was also heavily involved in the attempts to recall Councilman Mark Brown and Councilman Dottie Greer. Both attempts were plagued with fraud, forgeries and misrepresentation.
THE PEOPLE SPEAK - Letters To The Editor
Mr. Brockmeyer,
Many thanks to you for carrying such complete coverage of next Sunday’s Crescendo Concert Series event, the Diane Bish organ concert at Foundry Art Centre. We could not have asked for more – three distinct references in our announcing the Target grant, in the ad space we purchased, and then our writing to cover next Sunday’s event, of course.
We feel the fruits of our efforts are becoming more apparent with greater audiences, more recognition, and expressions of appreciation for what we’re doing heard more often. The role played by First Capitol News in helping us along to meet that end is truly supportive and important to us. I know I speak for the other members of the Crescendo Concert Board in thanking you.
With best regards,
Beth Morris
Many thanks to you for carrying such complete coverage of next Sunday’s Crescendo Concert Series event, the Diane Bish organ concert at Foundry Art Centre. We could not have asked for more – three distinct references in our announcing the Target grant, in the ad space we purchased, and then our writing to cover next Sunday’s event, of course.
We feel the fruits of our efforts are becoming more apparent with greater audiences, more recognition, and expressions of appreciation for what we’re doing heard more often. The role played by First Capitol News in helping us along to meet that end is truly supportive and important to us. I know I speak for the other members of the Crescendo Concert Board in thanking you.
With best regards,
Beth Morris
CAse In Point By Joe Koester, Councilman Ward 9
In contrast to the many investigations the GOP launched of the Clinton administration, “when Bush came into power there wasn’t a scandal too big for them to ignore.” Congressman Henry Waxman
The midterm elections punctuated the feelings of the majority of Americans. Frankly, the election results have brought us hope in a system that most of us sense has grown more corrupt in the past twelve years rather than less corrupt as promised. The broken “Contract with America” has now made it through the electoral litigation system and the judgment rendered by voters from coast to coast is that the GOP is guilty of breaking its contract on all counts. The empty claims by the GOP that they held a monopoly on morals and ethics has ceased and hopefully, after so many years, the moral taglines that they have used to trump sound reasons to vote Democrat have waned too. Remember - Democrats don’t want to take your guns, kill babies, or revive the Soviet Union!
Locally, the Democrats did much better than the mainstream media gave credit for. Democrats ran competitive races on shoestring budgets. Imagine if we get election reform that allows real competition – debates about issues rather than endless mailers that convince by way of their sheer volume. Go ahead and check out the expenditures of both sides in St. Charles County – you will see that Democrats did very well on anemic budgets collected mainly from working people and local businesses. You will see that the GOP was flooded with special interest dollars that allowed them to send out more than three times the mailers, pay for polling and automated telephone calls, buy billboards, by news ads, - advertise their candidates ad nauseum; it was truly RC Cola versus Coca-Cola. It is true that we fell short in most local races; however, local Democrats did their part to help elect Democrats to higher office on a state and federal level.
My sincere thanks go out to everyone who supported my campaign including (but definitely not limited to): Sara Schneider and Eleanor and Larry McCune. Several volunteers helped put rubber bands on literature, walk door-to-door, or make telephone calls. Campaigns are bigger still and I thank each voter who placed his or her trust in me on Election Day. Furthermore, I want to thank those who allowed me to put up a campaign sign – I appreciate that this simple act takes a measure of courage.
For the most part, the campaign remained about issues. As the challenger, I kept my message simple – stop special interest legislation and help bring equity to our schools. Of course, I wanted to send out a host of other mailers about many issues such as Lindenwood and stopping predatory lenders, but neither money nor campaign advisors would allow tackling too much for a single campaign.
Of course, I wasn’t happy when a mailer stated that I was trying to “hurt seniors” when actually I was trying to use limited resources to help those seniors who may need help the most. Or when a weird mailer stated, “Top Secret – What Joe Koester and Rory Riddler don’t want you to know.” First, Mr. Riddler wasn’t running for office and second, what the mailer contained I wanted everyone to know! Our city’s interests were not represented when state legislation forced us to give away our sewer service without annexation by the recipients of that service. Furthermore, two more claims were bogus – the residents of St. Charles Hills were never in jeopardy of losing service as claimed, our focus was on new development and simply bringing 230 high-end homes into our city to help pay their fair share of taxes for the necessary upgrading of sewer treatment plants.
This leads to the other misrepresented issue, namely, that 230 homes paying a slightly higher sewer rate somehow is a win-win situation for our city. This “benefit” doesn’t come close to the real benefits that annexation would have brought including: added population to our town which can be helpful in obtaining federal grants and assistance; overall added value to our community for bonding issues; and the real estate and property taxes that would have more than made up for the 200 plus homes that Lindenwood’s acquisitions have removed from our books. Finally, a last-minute mailer called me a liar – no explanation, no examples, just name calling at its best or worst. Our campaign’s mailings focused on special interests and education. In other words about voting records and issues – never once did we question the honesty of the other candidate, nor did we simply call names.
Overall, I was happy with the elections - everyone has to admit, it is good to see challenges again in St. Charles County. The Two Party System works better with two parties. Our system will become stronger with campaign finance reform. That may be a long ways off, but you never know...remember when the Berlin Wall came down about fifty years before we thought it would?
City issues were interesting — the higher the pay for the mayor, the stronger the vote in opposition. Also, the community center received a majority vote, however, not the four-sevenths vote necessary to issue bonds. The charter amendments passed. St. Charles County had about 60% of registered voters go to the polls.
THE CITY DESK - Rory Riddler, Councilman Ward 1
Name Change May Be In Order
For Founding Father Of Florissant
Since the 18th Century, the people of Florissant have honored the name of Francois Dunegant as their founder and first Spanish Commandant of this historic community. There is even a city park named for him. While the man so honored is the same, it appears the history books will have to be rewritten somewhat. New evidence has uncovered what is likely the original spelling of the surname of Florissant’s most distinguished historic personage and with it, new details of his life and family.
Unearthing this 220 year old mistake began as a collaborative effort between myself and Florissant’s Mayor Robert Lowery. Like St. Charles, Florissant takes pride in its French Colonial roots. Knowing my interest in historic research, I was asked to help pull together a biographical sketch of what was then known of the life of Francois “Dunegant” at the behest of the Mayor in 2004. What bothered me as an amateur historian was the lack of details of Dunegant’s life prior to coming to St. Louis and ultimately Florissant. There simply weren’t any other Dunegant family records or histories outside of St. Louis and Florissant. Most knowledgeable people knew the name was probably misspelled, but variations that were tried didn’t pan out.
For ex-Police Chief turned Mayor Lowery, this was the ultimate cold case. But it also presented a challenge to someone use to uncovering the facts. I was asked to do further voluntary research and try every angle to help uncover Florissant’s true heritage. Recently we made a major breakthrough.
The break came not from the numerous variations on the spelling of Dunegant we had tried, but from researching his “dit” name. Both Francois and his brother Charles shared a “dit” name. The French term dit can substitute for a hyphen in double family names or can be a nickname or alias of sorts. It can also refer to land owned or inhabited by an ancestor, or the name of an ancestor. The practice of using dit names is archaic, but was widespread among the French settlers of New France. Our own Louis Blanchette, the founder of St. Charles, had a dit name as well. Blanchette was called “the hunter”.
The Dunegant’s dit name was Beaurosier. Previous Florissant histories had not speculated on the meaning, and there was no direct translation available, however, it is most likely a compound word. “Beau” for beautiful and “rosier” meaning a rose bush, bed or arbor.
It seemed to be a strange “nickname” for someone to share with their brother on the frontier of civilization, so I focused on trying to uncover anyone who shared the same dit name Beaurosier. Following the dit name provided the break we were looking for.
In genealogical records I was able to find a Francois “Lunegent” who was born in Treguier, Bretagne (Brittany) and married to a Louise Ouimet who was born in 1724 in Sault-au-Recollet. The records show the couple were married on the 19th of February 1748 at Notre Dame in Montreal.
The marriage record lists this Francois Lunegent’s father as Bertrand Lunegent dit Beaurosier and his mother as Francoise Goiselout. There are also listed the names of Louise Ouimet’s parents, Pierre Ouimet and Marguerite Brault Pommainville.
We knew that the Francois who founded Florissant was named after his father and that his mother was Louise Ouimet. These were most likely his parents. We also knew that Florissant’s Francois was born in 1752 so the ages were right for these to be his parents.
It was the Beaurosier dit name that led to the Lunegent spelling of the name.
But this particular genealogical record only listed the birth of a daughter to this couple; a Charlotte Beaurosier Lunegent Boursier. Even with a match for the father’s first name, the mother’s name and the corresponding dates, we did not have a direct link to Florissant’s Francois that we could prove.
As the Mayor, a former long-term Police Chief would say, we needed more collaborating evidence before changing the name on a park and in the official histories of the region. Armed now with the spelling as Lunegent, I undertook further research and soon got the break we needed. Translating a notation from a work called, La Population des Forts Francais d’Amerique du XVIII Siecle or roughly The Population Of The 18th Century American Forts by Marthe Fairbault-Beauregard, I found the here-to-fore elusive baptismal record of Florissant’s founding father.
In Volume I, page 31, there is a notation about a baptism that occurred on the 9th of December in 1752. It took place at Fort Frederic and states that Marie Coulon de Villiers, wife of M. Douville, a Lieutenant of Infantry and second in commend of the fort, was the godmother for the baptism of a Francois Michel Luenegaud (corrected in document to Lunegent). This Francois it states was the son of a Francois and Marie Louise Quimet.
Here was the additional evidence we needed. We had a son whose name matches, being born to parents whose names match those of our Francois and born in the right year. We also now have two separate sources for a Lunegent spelling. Lowery had also learned, in his years of police work, that there comes a point where the evidence makes its own case.
This same French document said that the Lunegents were “inhabitants des cotes voisines”. While an obscure reference today, a 1611 French dictionary lists voisine as meaning neighbors. Cotes can be a slope, hill or shore. I would speculate this meant that the Lunegents were living at this time on a neighboring shore to Fort Frederic.
Fort Frederic in 1752 was an imposing stone fortress, with a multi-storied massive keep, much like a medieval castle. It was located at Crown Point on Lake Champlain in New York, an area then under French control. The fort was abandoned when the French pulled out in 1759 and they dismantled it so the British could not use it.
What brought the Lunegents inside Fort Frederic may have been the birth of their son or for protection during an incident in the French and Indian Wars. Francois Lunegent’s birth inside the fort, explains why his baptismal record was not with other Church records which recorded his parents marriage and the birth of a sister.
While the genealogical record first found, did not list Florissant’s Father as having the same dit name, but only listed the grandfather’s, a third document clears that up as well. It is a record from France that shows a Francois Lunegent dit Beaurosier, from St. Jean-Kerdaniel in Cotes d’Armor left France with a destination of Quebec. This area is also in Brittany.
As a footnote to the story, this area of Brittany is known as the ‘rose’ granite coast. A nearby town today is described as being famous for its beautiful ‘flowered’ houses covered with trellises of flowers. Perhaps with more research we can establish that the Beaurosier dit name and the memories passed down from father to son of their homeland may have influenced the naming of Florissant itself.
What brought Francois Lunegent, the father of Florissant’s Francois to New France? Records show his occupation at the time of his arrival being a “Soldat dans les troupes de la Marine, campagnie de St. Ours.” He arrived as a member of the French Marines and his company assigned to the village of St. Ours. These early records also show his birth date in Vers of 1723 and his first mention in the military records of New France in the year 1745. The military records add a further twist to the mystery, spelling his last name Lunegan, though including the dit name Beaurosier.
Previously we knew that our Francois had a brother named Charles who also came to St. Louis. His name in our local histories appears as Charles Dunegant. But he is listed in early French records of Quebec as being born Charles Lunegent dit Beaurosier in the year 1759, so that we now know Charles was Francois’ younger brother by seven years. Records from Quebec show Charles was likely born in the Village de Longueuil, placing Francois in this lower village of Montreal at the time. In September of 1760 Montreal surrendered to the British. Still to be uncovered is what happened to the Lunegent Family from 1759 (when Francois was 7) till he began farming in St. Louis in 1768 at the age of 16.
The dit name Beaurosier also led us to records that indicate Francois may have had as many as three sisters. Charlotte, who was previously cited, married a Prosper Desgroseilliers on February 17, 1772 and the couple had five children. A Marie Louise Lunegent married a Thomas Fissiau Laramee in Beauhamois, Quebec and their marriage record indicates she was born in 1750, also at Fort St. Frederique. And a Marguerite Lunegent Beaurosier married a Jacques Dorais in Montreal and her date of birth in 1749 and dit name also make her a likely older sister of our Francois as well.
So how did Lunegent of Lunegan get to be Dunegant in Florissant records? For one thing, he was illiterate. A contemporary described him in later life as being embarrassed that he could not read or write. He would have been only eight years old when Quebec fell to the British in 1760. The disruption of the war would likely have interrupted his formal education.
Our Francois did, however, affix a signature to official documents. Many people who could not read or write learned to copy their own signature. It appears on these documents to be Dunegan, So we are left with a further mystery. Did Francois Michel Lunegent dit Beaurosier, the founder of the City of Florissant, change his name for some reason? Was it taught to him as an adult the wrong way? Or was it being signed by others for him? I think it unlikely he changed his name because he was trying to hide. If he wanted to change identities, he would have changed his dit name as well. Keeping his dit name showed he was proud of the name of his father and grandfather whom he inherited the name from.
On September 13, 1825, Lunegent died at the age of 73 and was buried in the parish cemetery. The burial register of St. Ferdinand’s records that Du Negant (as it was listed) “…was the founder of this village.” Perhaps the priest may not have been as familiar with the rough French spoken by the older inhabitants of the newly Americanized Florissant. It isn’t such a great leap from Lu to Du. These mistakes are common to anyone who has done any genealogical research on their own family, it is just a little more unusual in a historic personage people thought they knew so well.
Mayor Lowery said he will recommend to the City Council modifying the name Dunegant by adding Lunegent as the predominant variant or original spelling. He would also like to see the memory of Francois Michel Lunegent dit Beaurosier recognized in a statue depicting the founder of Florissant. The Mayor added, “I believe an accurate portrayal of Francois should one day grace our community and perhaps, help make up for getting his name wrong all these years.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)