Click on image to enlarge. SCROLL DOWN TO READ ENTIRE EDITION
Saturday, June 03, 2006
FRONT PAGE - FIRST CAPITOL NEWS - June 3, 2006
Click on image to enlarge. SCROLL DOWN TO READ ENTIRE EDITION
Investigation Into Recall Uncovers More Fraud
Evidence Turned Over To FBI
By Tony Brockmeyer
St. Charles Police Chief Tim Swope has told the First Capitol News that several instances of fraud have been uncovered in the efforts, of the Citizens Empowerment Committee headed by Linda Meyer, to recall St. Charles City Councilman Mark Brown.
“At the prompting of the prosecuting attorney we have started our initial investigation of the Councilman Brown recall effort,” said Chief Swope. “We have not yet discovered any forgeries but prompted by letters we sent out to the people whose signatures were on the petitions we have received about 30 total complaints some of which claim misrepresentation and lying by the people soliciting the recall signatures. People said they were not being told the truth about why their signatures were needed. Our investigation is continuing and we will follow wherever it leads. It appears that some of the same affidavit fraud committed during the Councilwoman Dottie Greer recall attempts has also been committed in the Councilman Mark Brown recall efforts.”
Swope declined further comment due to this being an ongoing investigation.
A source close to the recall effort told the First Capitol News they expected forgeries to be uncovered. They said if you just look at the petitions it is obvious that many different signatures were written by the same person.
Councilman Mark Brown told the First Capitol News, “I certainly believe that the police investigation will uncover forgeries. They spent months investigating Councilwoman Greer’s recall petitions and I would expect it will take them some time to investigate the efforts against me. It is mostly all the same people involved. You do not have to be a handwriting expert to look at the petitions and see the same person signed numerous signatures. They also have sworn depositions where people admitted to fraud at the direction of a police officer’s wife who is also the head of the recall committee. The Mayor also worked towards recalling Councilwoman Greer and should be a part of this investigation. Keep in mind the petitions were circulated by the same committee and the same people as Councilwoman Greer’s recall. I believe that when the police complete their investigation and present it to the prosecutor some of the backers of the recall attempts will find themselves facing jail time.”
Brown also said, “I was willing to stop the prosecution of this because there was no harm done if they wanted to stop their efforts to put it on the ballot. However, it seems they want to keep pushing and pursing. Now I believe that they should suffer the consequences for their unlawful acts. I am also officially going to ask that they expand this investigation into the Mayor’s participation and her actions with others, which appear to be a conspiracy to the embezzlement of City funds, which were used in the recall. They need to investigate the Mayor’s use of City funds and how the money was laundered through numerous fictitious names, which ultimately appears that they may have used that City money to fund this recall effort. Brown’s statement was pertaining to an investigation by the First Capitol News that has not yet been published in the First Capitol News, but was turned over to the St. Charles County prosecutor and has been forwarded to the FBI for further investigation.
Linda Meyer is the wife of a St. Charles police officer and heads the Citizens Empowerment Committee. Developer TR Hughes, PR guru Glennon Jamboretz, former Councilman and Mayoral confidant Ken Kielty, developer Mike Sellenschuetter and former hospital administrator Kevin Kast fund the Committee. Greer defeated the attempt to recall her. St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Jack Banas has indicted one person involved in the recall attempts but sources close to the investigation predict that more indictments will be made once the investigation of the Brown recall attempt is completed.
By Tony Brockmeyer
St. Charles Police Chief Tim Swope has told the First Capitol News that several instances of fraud have been uncovered in the efforts, of the Citizens Empowerment Committee headed by Linda Meyer, to recall St. Charles City Councilman Mark Brown.
“At the prompting of the prosecuting attorney we have started our initial investigation of the Councilman Brown recall effort,” said Chief Swope. “We have not yet discovered any forgeries but prompted by letters we sent out to the people whose signatures were on the petitions we have received about 30 total complaints some of which claim misrepresentation and lying by the people soliciting the recall signatures. People said they were not being told the truth about why their signatures were needed. Our investigation is continuing and we will follow wherever it leads. It appears that some of the same affidavit fraud committed during the Councilwoman Dottie Greer recall attempts has also been committed in the Councilman Mark Brown recall efforts.”
Swope declined further comment due to this being an ongoing investigation.
A source close to the recall effort told the First Capitol News they expected forgeries to be uncovered. They said if you just look at the petitions it is obvious that many different signatures were written by the same person.
Councilman Mark Brown told the First Capitol News, “I certainly believe that the police investigation will uncover forgeries. They spent months investigating Councilwoman Greer’s recall petitions and I would expect it will take them some time to investigate the efforts against me. It is mostly all the same people involved. You do not have to be a handwriting expert to look at the petitions and see the same person signed numerous signatures. They also have sworn depositions where people admitted to fraud at the direction of a police officer’s wife who is also the head of the recall committee. The Mayor also worked towards recalling Councilwoman Greer and should be a part of this investigation. Keep in mind the petitions were circulated by the same committee and the same people as Councilwoman Greer’s recall. I believe that when the police complete their investigation and present it to the prosecutor some of the backers of the recall attempts will find themselves facing jail time.”
Brown also said, “I was willing to stop the prosecution of this because there was no harm done if they wanted to stop their efforts to put it on the ballot. However, it seems they want to keep pushing and pursing. Now I believe that they should suffer the consequences for their unlawful acts. I am also officially going to ask that they expand this investigation into the Mayor’s participation and her actions with others, which appear to be a conspiracy to the embezzlement of City funds, which were used in the recall. They need to investigate the Mayor’s use of City funds and how the money was laundered through numerous fictitious names, which ultimately appears that they may have used that City money to fund this recall effort. Brown’s statement was pertaining to an investigation by the First Capitol News that has not yet been published in the First Capitol News, but was turned over to the St. Charles County prosecutor and has been forwarded to the FBI for further investigation.
Linda Meyer is the wife of a St. Charles police officer and heads the Citizens Empowerment Committee. Developer TR Hughes, PR guru Glennon Jamboretz, former Councilman and Mayoral confidant Ken Kielty, developer Mike Sellenschuetter and former hospital administrator Kevin Kast fund the Committee. Greer defeated the attempt to recall her. St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Jack Banas has indicted one person involved in the recall attempts but sources close to the investigation predict that more indictments will be made once the investigation of the Brown recall attempt is completed.
Council Considers Charter Changes For Nov. Ballot
By Phyllis Schaltenbrand
Tuesday night the City Council held a special work session to consider the recommendations of the special Council Charter Review Committee. The Committee was composed of Chairperson Rory Riddler, Councilmen Joe Koester, and Bob Kneemiller. Councilwoman Dottie Greer served as an alternate member of the committee. The committee reviewed their proposed changes to the City Charter, which if approved by the full Council after two readings, would most likely appear on the November ballot for voter approval.
The first recommendation dealt with staggering the terms of Council members so that all ten wards would not be up for reelection at the same time. The recommendation of the committee was to have those council members representing wards 1 thru 5 serve one four-year term upon their election in April 2007. Ward 6 thru 10 would continue to serve a three-year term. Then in April of 2011 those Council members who had been elected for the four-year term, their seats would revert to a three year-term. Council members Joe Koester and Dottie Greer voiced some skepticism on the need for this proposed change. Councilman Koester specifically saying, “It might help big money outside groups to more easily target Council races.” Councilman Riddler pointed out that the influence of big money in Council elections had proved to be a determent to those who spent so much in the recent recall attempt of Ms. Greer.
While the committee made no recommendation on the issue to submitting to the voter’s reconsideration of the major changes to the charter scheduled to take effect in April 2007, they did refer the matter to this work session for discussion. The Mayor stated that while she was not taking a position for or against resubmitting this issue to the voters that she felt asking them to vote on it again would be in some way insulting to them. Councilman Riddler pointed out that under those changes who ever is elected mayor in 2007 would have the authority to fire, not only department heads, but any city employee. “The ability of the Mayor to be able to fire rank and file employees would in fact turn our community into a patronage system, where every employee would have to owe their political allegiance to the Mayor or feel that their job was at risk. There is a difference in the quality of employees that work under a professional administrator and those that work in a political environment.”
Council President Bob Kneemiller stated that he was not in support of resubmitting this issue to the voters. Councilman Koester and Brown pointed out that voters primarily felt they were voting on the issue of having a full time Mayor. “They did not know that they were voting to get rid of the position of City Administrator, said Councilman Mark Brown.
A great deal of discussion centered on proposed changes to the charter section dealing with recalls. The Mayor launched the discussion by proposing that there be an up or down vote on whether voters want the power of recall or not. The City Attorney is looking into the question of whether or not the specific changes and amendments to the section on recall could be on the same ballot as the Mayor’s proposed vote to eliminate that section on the Charter altogether.
It was unclear from the discussion, which ensued if the Mayors proposal enjoyed a majority of support from the Council, or not. Councilman Hoepfner and Councilwoman Greer both said that voters might want to retain that right. Councilwoman Greer in particular noted that voters in her ward were more concerned with the abuse of the power of recall than it’s elimination.
Charter review committee Chair Riddler had proposed several specific changes to be considered by the full Council. These included specifying that recall be used only for malfeasance in office, that someone who survived a recall vote would not be subject to recall for a period of 12 months thereafter, that petitions circulated would have to include a statement of the grounds for recall, that initiative and recall petitions would have to be filed within six months of the formation of the petitioners committee, and that only registered voters of the County of St. Charles may circulate petitions for initiative, referendum or recall, and election for recall could only be on a April, August or November ballot.
Malfeasance is defined as wrongdoing, especially by an elected official. Committee Chair Rory Riddler said, “It’s easier to know what it is other than what it isn’t. I know it isn’t a couple of neighbors not wanting a cell tower in the neighborhood like the issue which was used to bring about the recall attempt of Councilwoman Greer.
A minor proposed change was to specify that any person authorized by law to administer oaths might swear Council members into office. Councilmen Joe Koester and Bob Hoepfner both pointed out that this had become an issue with some persons in the community when St. Charles Circuit Judge William Lohmar had been asked as a personal friend of some members, to swear in some Council members following the past election. Supporters of the Mayor had often said in the press, this was a “slight” to the Mayor who had sworn members in three years earlier. However, prior to this administration the City Clerk most often swore in Council members.
The committee proposed that any changes or regulations promulgated by the City Administrator to the administrative code of the City have to be approved by ordinance. The administrative code deals with the plan of organization and structure of City government. The original administrative code was adopted by the Council per the Charter, but the City Administrator is free to make changes without Council approval at the current time. In a section dealing with the Parks and Recreation Board some Park Board members had asked it be made more clear that funds derived from the Metropolitan Park and Recreation District as grant revenue sharing funds be under their sole direction. There had been some concern at the administration had been insisting on City approval for the transfer of these funds to parks. Advocates of “Proposition P,” previously passed by voters, had pointed out the intent was to give the Park Board as much autonomy in the spending of funds for park purposes as possible.
Another section dealing with the Park Board would require the Mayor to bring forward a nomination for appointment to the Council within 60 days of a vacancy or 30 days of the expiration of a current Park Board member’s term, the reappointment for a new member for appointment. And that should the Mayor’s proposed appointment be turned down by the City Council, the Mayor would be required to bring forward a new nominee within 45 days. The reason this was considered important is the Charter currently states that a member whose term has expired continues to serve until their replacement is appointed and confirmed.
Park Board member Thomas Smith had previously been up for reappointment but the Mayor withdrew his name prior to the Council voting on his potential reappointment. It was believed at the time she did so to avoid having his nomination rejected by the Council. However she has not brought forward his name or any other name for his seat for over a year thus leaving him a voting member of the Park Board passed the expiration of his term. It was felt important that this loophole not continue to be used in the future. (See related story regarding Thomas Smith in this issue and on our archives on the web, firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com, issue of May 13, 2006 – Money Laundering or Smart Politics – The people have a right to know.)
The duties of the purchasing agent would be expanded if another of the committee’s recommendations were approved. This proposal would have the purchasing agent also administer the securing of services required by any department or office. The purchasing agent currently oversees the purchases of supplies and equipment and only acts to assist departments on services when requested to do so.
The Council will also consider requiring that the City budget be in a form the Council would authorize by ordinance. Previously Council members have had issues with the format and confusing nature of the annual budget documents.
One minor house cleaning measure would simply reflect that we currently operate under a five-year capitol improvement plan while the existing charter language only specifies a three-year plan.
A proposal to increase the number of signatures required by Candidates for Mayor, Municipal Judge and Council Members was deemed to be unnecessary by a majority of members at the planning meeting and was withdrawn from consideration.
The issue will go before the full Council in bill form along with the other items discussed at the work session. It is most likely that the bills will be introduced at the second Council meeting in June and approved to go on the ballot at the first meeting in August.
Tuesday night the City Council held a special work session to consider the recommendations of the special Council Charter Review Committee. The Committee was composed of Chairperson Rory Riddler, Councilmen Joe Koester, and Bob Kneemiller. Councilwoman Dottie Greer served as an alternate member of the committee. The committee reviewed their proposed changes to the City Charter, which if approved by the full Council after two readings, would most likely appear on the November ballot for voter approval.
The first recommendation dealt with staggering the terms of Council members so that all ten wards would not be up for reelection at the same time. The recommendation of the committee was to have those council members representing wards 1 thru 5 serve one four-year term upon their election in April 2007. Ward 6 thru 10 would continue to serve a three-year term. Then in April of 2011 those Council members who had been elected for the four-year term, their seats would revert to a three year-term. Council members Joe Koester and Dottie Greer voiced some skepticism on the need for this proposed change. Councilman Koester specifically saying, “It might help big money outside groups to more easily target Council races.” Councilman Riddler pointed out that the influence of big money in Council elections had proved to be a determent to those who spent so much in the recent recall attempt of Ms. Greer.
While the committee made no recommendation on the issue to submitting to the voter’s reconsideration of the major changes to the charter scheduled to take effect in April 2007, they did refer the matter to this work session for discussion. The Mayor stated that while she was not taking a position for or against resubmitting this issue to the voters that she felt asking them to vote on it again would be in some way insulting to them. Councilman Riddler pointed out that under those changes who ever is elected mayor in 2007 would have the authority to fire, not only department heads, but any city employee. “The ability of the Mayor to be able to fire rank and file employees would in fact turn our community into a patronage system, where every employee would have to owe their political allegiance to the Mayor or feel that their job was at risk. There is a difference in the quality of employees that work under a professional administrator and those that work in a political environment.”
Council President Bob Kneemiller stated that he was not in support of resubmitting this issue to the voters. Councilman Koester and Brown pointed out that voters primarily felt they were voting on the issue of having a full time Mayor. “They did not know that they were voting to get rid of the position of City Administrator, said Councilman Mark Brown.
A great deal of discussion centered on proposed changes to the charter section dealing with recalls. The Mayor launched the discussion by proposing that there be an up or down vote on whether voters want the power of recall or not. The City Attorney is looking into the question of whether or not the specific changes and amendments to the section on recall could be on the same ballot as the Mayor’s proposed vote to eliminate that section on the Charter altogether.
It was unclear from the discussion, which ensued if the Mayors proposal enjoyed a majority of support from the Council, or not. Councilman Hoepfner and Councilwoman Greer both said that voters might want to retain that right. Councilwoman Greer in particular noted that voters in her ward were more concerned with the abuse of the power of recall than it’s elimination.
Charter review committee Chair Riddler had proposed several specific changes to be considered by the full Council. These included specifying that recall be used only for malfeasance in office, that someone who survived a recall vote would not be subject to recall for a period of 12 months thereafter, that petitions circulated would have to include a statement of the grounds for recall, that initiative and recall petitions would have to be filed within six months of the formation of the petitioners committee, and that only registered voters of the County of St. Charles may circulate petitions for initiative, referendum or recall, and election for recall could only be on a April, August or November ballot.
Malfeasance is defined as wrongdoing, especially by an elected official. Committee Chair Rory Riddler said, “It’s easier to know what it is other than what it isn’t. I know it isn’t a couple of neighbors not wanting a cell tower in the neighborhood like the issue which was used to bring about the recall attempt of Councilwoman Greer.
A minor proposed change was to specify that any person authorized by law to administer oaths might swear Council members into office. Councilmen Joe Koester and Bob Hoepfner both pointed out that this had become an issue with some persons in the community when St. Charles Circuit Judge William Lohmar had been asked as a personal friend of some members, to swear in some Council members following the past election. Supporters of the Mayor had often said in the press, this was a “slight” to the Mayor who had sworn members in three years earlier. However, prior to this administration the City Clerk most often swore in Council members.
The committee proposed that any changes or regulations promulgated by the City Administrator to the administrative code of the City have to be approved by ordinance. The administrative code deals with the plan of organization and structure of City government. The original administrative code was adopted by the Council per the Charter, but the City Administrator is free to make changes without Council approval at the current time. In a section dealing with the Parks and Recreation Board some Park Board members had asked it be made more clear that funds derived from the Metropolitan Park and Recreation District as grant revenue sharing funds be under their sole direction. There had been some concern at the administration had been insisting on City approval for the transfer of these funds to parks. Advocates of “Proposition P,” previously passed by voters, had pointed out the intent was to give the Park Board as much autonomy in the spending of funds for park purposes as possible.
Another section dealing with the Park Board would require the Mayor to bring forward a nomination for appointment to the Council within 60 days of a vacancy or 30 days of the expiration of a current Park Board member’s term, the reappointment for a new member for appointment. And that should the Mayor’s proposed appointment be turned down by the City Council, the Mayor would be required to bring forward a new nominee within 45 days. The reason this was considered important is the Charter currently states that a member whose term has expired continues to serve until their replacement is appointed and confirmed.
Park Board member Thomas Smith had previously been up for reappointment but the Mayor withdrew his name prior to the Council voting on his potential reappointment. It was believed at the time she did so to avoid having his nomination rejected by the Council. However she has not brought forward his name or any other name for his seat for over a year thus leaving him a voting member of the Park Board passed the expiration of his term. It was felt important that this loophole not continue to be used in the future. (See related story regarding Thomas Smith in this issue and on our archives on the web, firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com, issue of May 13, 2006 – Money Laundering or Smart Politics – The people have a right to know.)
The duties of the purchasing agent would be expanded if another of the committee’s recommendations were approved. This proposal would have the purchasing agent also administer the securing of services required by any department or office. The purchasing agent currently oversees the purchases of supplies and equipment and only acts to assist departments on services when requested to do so.
The Council will also consider requiring that the City budget be in a form the Council would authorize by ordinance. Previously Council members have had issues with the format and confusing nature of the annual budget documents.
One minor house cleaning measure would simply reflect that we currently operate under a five-year capitol improvement plan while the existing charter language only specifies a three-year plan.
A proposal to increase the number of signatures required by Candidates for Mayor, Municipal Judge and Council Members was deemed to be unnecessary by a majority of members at the planning meeting and was withdrawn from consideration.
The issue will go before the full Council in bill form along with the other items discussed at the work session. It is most likely that the bills will be introduced at the second Council meeting in June and approved to go on the ballot at the first meeting in August.
MONEY LAUNDERING OR SMART POLITICS?
The People Have A Right To Know
By Phyllis Schaltenbrand
And Tony Brockmeyer
SECOND IN A SERIES
To circumvent political contribution limits Legislative Party Committees have been formed. Unlimited contributions have been given to these Legislative District Committees and are then funneled through backdoors making it almost impossible for the public to know who is giving and who is receiving.
Through our investigation the First Capitol News has learned that TEN of those back door funding Legislative Committees are being operated out of a home at 320 Monroe Street in St. Charles with the treasurer for each committee listed as Thomas W. Smith, Jr. As we reported in our May 13, 2006 edition (available on our web log in our archives t firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com) we have also discovered several fictitious registered companies apparently unlicensed, owned and operated by Smith, receiving funds from these same committees.
Smith is a legislative aide to State Representative Tom Dempsey (R 18) of St. Charles who is the Majority Floor Leader in the House of Representatives, a very powerful position.
Smith is also the treasurer of the Republican 18th Legislative District Committee, which gives an address of 320 Monroe Street in St Charles, a home that is owned by Smith. In the latest report filed on April 8, 2006 the Republican 18th Legislative District Committee listed total receipts for this election previously reported at $201.705 with money on hand at the close of this reporting period $26,043. This committee was established on October 17, 2003. In future stories in this series we will provide information on where these contributions came from and where the money has gone. It is interesting to note that one of the largest contributors for this reporting period of the Republican 18th Legislative District Committee was Ameristar Casinos who contributed $17,500. This reporting period is for the last four months.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, is also the treasurer of the 12th Legislative District Republican Committee with the same address of 320 Monroe Street in St. Charles. In reports filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission this committee reports total receipts for this election period at $100,950 and money on hand at $4,403.50. This committee was established on August 31, 2004.
The 14th Legislative District Republican Committee also with Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, as the treasurer and the address as 320 Monroe St. in St. Charles in papers filed as of April 8, 2006 listed total receipts for this election at $120,550 with $9,400 on hand. The 14th District Committee was established on August 31, 2004.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, is the treasurer for the 15th Legislative District Republican Committee also as 320 Monroe St. This committee lists total receipts for this election period at $29,000 with $1,600 on hand. The 15th Committee was established on November 28, 2005.
The 16th Legislative District Republican Committee at 320 Monroe St. with Smith, dempsey’s legislative aide, as treasurer reports as of March 24, 2006 receipts for this election at $70,400 with $1,930.84 on hand. This committee was established on August 31, 2004.
The 17th Legislative District Republican Committee in a report dated March 24, 2006 lists receipts for this election at $108,600 with $28,900 on hand. This committee is listed at 320 Monroe Street and Thomas W. Smith, Jr., Dempsey’s legislative aide, is the treasurer. The committee was established on August 31, 2004.
The 19th Legislative District Republican Committee at 320 Monroe Street with Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, as the treasurer lists in their February 24, 2006 report receipts for this election at $63,550 with $1,500 on hand. This committee was established on August 31, 2004.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, is the treasurer of the 89th Legislative District Republican Committee with the same address, 320 Monroe St. The committee, which was established on December 29, 2003 lists in its latest report receipts of $45,360 for this election period with $2,116 on hand.
The 2nd Senatorial District Republican Committee lists Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide as treasurer at 320 Monroe Street. Their report dated 3/24/2006 lists receipts for this election period at $276,100 with $11,587.91 on hand. The 2nd District Committee was established on June 16, 2003.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide is the treasurer of the 23rd Senatorial District Republican Committee also at 320 Monroe Street, which was established on October 7, 2004. In their report dated April 8, 2006 they list receipts for $103,675 with $12,024 on hand at the close of the reporting period.
The figures above for the Legislative District Republican Committees are only those filed in the latest report. Later in this series we will take you back to the inception of the committees giving the total amounts that have been received and distributed through this back door method.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, is also listed as the treasurer of the Colonel Jack Jackson For State Auditor Committee, which was established on January 28, 2002. In the report filed on April 15, 2006 it lists total receipts for this election at $145,587.64 with money on hand at the close of the reporting period totaling $661,241.28.
An observer of Missouri politics remarked, “Can you just imagine what power Tom Dempsey has with his legislative aide being the treasurer of all these legislative committees and the tremendous amount of money being funneled through them.”
Who is giving all the money flowing through these committees and who is benefiting from the donations? The First Capitol News believes the people have a right to know. Where does the money come from, where does it go and what do the givers expect to receive for it? How does it affect the problems we are experiencing in the City of St. Charles and the State of Missouri? Our investigative series will continue in our next edition.
By Phyllis Schaltenbrand
And Tony Brockmeyer
SECOND IN A SERIES
To circumvent political contribution limits Legislative Party Committees have been formed. Unlimited contributions have been given to these Legislative District Committees and are then funneled through backdoors making it almost impossible for the public to know who is giving and who is receiving.
Through our investigation the First Capitol News has learned that TEN of those back door funding Legislative Committees are being operated out of a home at 320 Monroe Street in St. Charles with the treasurer for each committee listed as Thomas W. Smith, Jr. As we reported in our May 13, 2006 edition (available on our web log in our archives t firstcapitolnews.blogspot.com) we have also discovered several fictitious registered companies apparently unlicensed, owned and operated by Smith, receiving funds from these same committees.
Smith is a legislative aide to State Representative Tom Dempsey (R 18) of St. Charles who is the Majority Floor Leader in the House of Representatives, a very powerful position.
Smith is also the treasurer of the Republican 18th Legislative District Committee, which gives an address of 320 Monroe Street in St Charles, a home that is owned by Smith. In the latest report filed on April 8, 2006 the Republican 18th Legislative District Committee listed total receipts for this election previously reported at $201.705 with money on hand at the close of this reporting period $26,043. This committee was established on October 17, 2003. In future stories in this series we will provide information on where these contributions came from and where the money has gone. It is interesting to note that one of the largest contributors for this reporting period of the Republican 18th Legislative District Committee was Ameristar Casinos who contributed $17,500. This reporting period is for the last four months.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, is also the treasurer of the 12th Legislative District Republican Committee with the same address of 320 Monroe Street in St. Charles. In reports filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission this committee reports total receipts for this election period at $100,950 and money on hand at $4,403.50. This committee was established on August 31, 2004.
The 14th Legislative District Republican Committee also with Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, as the treasurer and the address as 320 Monroe St. in St. Charles in papers filed as of April 8, 2006 listed total receipts for this election at $120,550 with $9,400 on hand. The 14th District Committee was established on August 31, 2004.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, is the treasurer for the 15th Legislative District Republican Committee also as 320 Monroe St. This committee lists total receipts for this election period at $29,000 with $1,600 on hand. The 15th Committee was established on November 28, 2005.
The 16th Legislative District Republican Committee at 320 Monroe St. with Smith, dempsey’s legislative aide, as treasurer reports as of March 24, 2006 receipts for this election at $70,400 with $1,930.84 on hand. This committee was established on August 31, 2004.
The 17th Legislative District Republican Committee in a report dated March 24, 2006 lists receipts for this election at $108,600 with $28,900 on hand. This committee is listed at 320 Monroe Street and Thomas W. Smith, Jr., Dempsey’s legislative aide, is the treasurer. The committee was established on August 31, 2004.
The 19th Legislative District Republican Committee at 320 Monroe Street with Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, as the treasurer lists in their February 24, 2006 report receipts for this election at $63,550 with $1,500 on hand. This committee was established on August 31, 2004.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, is the treasurer of the 89th Legislative District Republican Committee with the same address, 320 Monroe St. The committee, which was established on December 29, 2003 lists in its latest report receipts of $45,360 for this election period with $2,116 on hand.
The 2nd Senatorial District Republican Committee lists Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide as treasurer at 320 Monroe Street. Their report dated 3/24/2006 lists receipts for this election period at $276,100 with $11,587.91 on hand. The 2nd District Committee was established on June 16, 2003.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide is the treasurer of the 23rd Senatorial District Republican Committee also at 320 Monroe Street, which was established on October 7, 2004. In their report dated April 8, 2006 they list receipts for $103,675 with $12,024 on hand at the close of the reporting period.
The figures above for the Legislative District Republican Committees are only those filed in the latest report. Later in this series we will take you back to the inception of the committees giving the total amounts that have been received and distributed through this back door method.
Smith, Dempsey’s legislative aide, is also listed as the treasurer of the Colonel Jack Jackson For State Auditor Committee, which was established on January 28, 2002. In the report filed on April 15, 2006 it lists total receipts for this election at $145,587.64 with money on hand at the close of the reporting period totaling $661,241.28.
An observer of Missouri politics remarked, “Can you just imagine what power Tom Dempsey has with his legislative aide being the treasurer of all these legislative committees and the tremendous amount of money being funneled through them.”
Who is giving all the money flowing through these committees and who is benefiting from the donations? The First Capitol News believes the people have a right to know. Where does the money come from, where does it go and what do the givers expect to receive for it? How does it affect the problems we are experiencing in the City of St. Charles and the State of Missouri? Our investigative series will continue in our next edition.
Fleur de Lis Market On N. Second Street Sat. June 10
By Lynndi Lockenour
The Fleur de Lis Market on North Second Street in Frenchtown will take place this year on Saturday, June 10, 2006 from 10 a.m. until 6 p.m. The event brought approximately 2500 people to the area last year and chairwoman of the festival, Roxanne Jacobs, said this year seems promising already.
Currently there are 15 antique booths, along with the local shops, 5 food vendors offering a variety of ethnic foods, and Vivian’s Vineyards will also have a beer garden. Jacobs said there was talk that the Market wasn’t going to happen this year, but she was able to rally enough support to continue the event. “It’s great for all the businesses down here,” she said.
Jacobs owns Nooks ‘n Crannies, an antique shop on North Second Street, and her shop has been in business nearly four years. She says locals, as well as out-of-towners turn out for the festival every year, with some even coming back annually. “Sometimes I get people who come back into the store after they first came to the festival,” she said. “It’s nice to see that people enjoy it so much.”
Drawing people back each year, Jacobs said, are the settings each shop and booth offer individually. Juried booths offer buyers a more personal environment, and she said this brings the crowds back. “Last year’s market was very successful and everyone had a great time,” she said. “We hope to continue that with this year’s market.”
One new attraction adding to this year’s atmosphere will be the appearance of vintage cars, as well as a performing mime. Also, four bands will be playing throughout the afternoon, offering a mix of jazz, soft rock, and country music genres. This years bands will be Black Dog and the Rainmakers (jazz) from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m., Fourplay (soft rock) from 2 p.m. until 6 p.m., Silverwings (country) from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m., and Maris Becket (soft rock) from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. There will be two separate music performance locations, one in the Premiere Catering parking lot, and the other in the lot of the old gas station in the 1500th block of North Second Street.
Booths are still available and Jacobs said she is currently looking for several quality crafters to add into the market as well. For information on the festival please contact Roxanne Jacobs at Nooks ‘n Crannies by calling (636) 949-6525.
The Fleur de Lis Market on North Second Street in Frenchtown will take place this year on Saturday, June 10, 2006 from 10 a.m. until 6 p.m. The event brought approximately 2500 people to the area last year and chairwoman of the festival, Roxanne Jacobs, said this year seems promising already.
Currently there are 15 antique booths, along with the local shops, 5 food vendors offering a variety of ethnic foods, and Vivian’s Vineyards will also have a beer garden. Jacobs said there was talk that the Market wasn’t going to happen this year, but she was able to rally enough support to continue the event. “It’s great for all the businesses down here,” she said.
Jacobs owns Nooks ‘n Crannies, an antique shop on North Second Street, and her shop has been in business nearly four years. She says locals, as well as out-of-towners turn out for the festival every year, with some even coming back annually. “Sometimes I get people who come back into the store after they first came to the festival,” she said. “It’s nice to see that people enjoy it so much.”
Drawing people back each year, Jacobs said, are the settings each shop and booth offer individually. Juried booths offer buyers a more personal environment, and she said this brings the crowds back. “Last year’s market was very successful and everyone had a great time,” she said. “We hope to continue that with this year’s market.”
One new attraction adding to this year’s atmosphere will be the appearance of vintage cars, as well as a performing mime. Also, four bands will be playing throughout the afternoon, offering a mix of jazz, soft rock, and country music genres. This years bands will be Black Dog and the Rainmakers (jazz) from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m., Fourplay (soft rock) from 2 p.m. until 6 p.m., Silverwings (country) from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m., and Maris Becket (soft rock) from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. There will be two separate music performance locations, one in the Premiere Catering parking lot, and the other in the lot of the old gas station in the 1500th block of North Second Street.
Booths are still available and Jacobs said she is currently looking for several quality crafters to add into the market as well. For information on the festival please contact Roxanne Jacobs at Nooks ‘n Crannies by calling (636) 949-6525.
RAMBLING WITH THE EDITOR - Tony Brockmeyer
Will City Council President Bob Kneemiller’s reign be one of
secrecy?
A work session of the St. Charles City Council meeting was held Tuesday evening. The meeting was held to discuss proposed changes to the City Charter that the voters will be asked to vote on in November. This is one of the most important documents in this City. It dictates the government that our residents must live under. But it was not televised on the City cable channel. The discussions were held at City Hall but the residents at home were deprived of the opportunity to listen to the debate. I am disappointed Council President Bob Kneemiller did not have this meeting televised. I hope that this is not an indication of things to come. All meetings of the City Council are important to the residents of St. Charles and they should all be televised.
Papa Lugi’s Pasta
Papa Lugi’s Pasta on Main Street has opened in the old waterworks building, formerly home to Maryland Yards. If you have not yet had the opportunity to stop in and partake of their offerings please do so. Everyone I spoke with who have eaten there raves about the food. Don and Mary Hart and their staff will be happy to welcome you into their restaurant. They are open from 4 pm to 10 pm Tuesday through Friday and from 11 am to 10 pm on Saturdays and Sundays. Plans are in the making to enlarge their deck, which they say, is already the largest deck at a restaurant in St. Charles.
Free Flicks
Historic Frenchtown is in their second year of providing free outdoor movies. They are presenting them on the fourth Friday of each month at the park on North Second Street.
New Town at St. Charles is offering outdoor movies every Friday evening at the New Town amphitheater. Rudy’s Ribs is the place to go in New Town on Friday evenings for popcorn and soda to enjoy with the movies. The movies are Free in both locations.
Indoor Volleyball Leagues at the Rec-Plex
If you can bump, set and spike, bring your volleyball skills to the St. Peters Rec-Plex and have fun in a competitive league this summer.
Women’s and Coed Competitive Volleyball Leagues are available at the Rec-Plex for players with better than average skills. Women’s Volleyball Leagues meet on Monday evenings beginning June 26. Coed Volleyball Leagues meet Wednesday evenings beginning June 28. An A/BB division (more highly skilled) and B division is available for both Women’s and Coed leagues.
The cost is $240 per team with each league needing a minimum of five teams to begin. To register or to learn more, call 636.939.2FUN or go online to stpetersmo.net and search Rec-Connect.
Summer Schedule
We will now be on our summer publishing schedule. During the months of June, July and August the First Capitol News will be published twice a month. Usually on the first and third Saturday. We will return to our weekly publication on September 9. In the meantime, you can follow breaking stories on our daily web log, firstcapitolnews-today.blogspot.com.
secrecy?
A work session of the St. Charles City Council meeting was held Tuesday evening. The meeting was held to discuss proposed changes to the City Charter that the voters will be asked to vote on in November. This is one of the most important documents in this City. It dictates the government that our residents must live under. But it was not televised on the City cable channel. The discussions were held at City Hall but the residents at home were deprived of the opportunity to listen to the debate. I am disappointed Council President Bob Kneemiller did not have this meeting televised. I hope that this is not an indication of things to come. All meetings of the City Council are important to the residents of St. Charles and they should all be televised.
Papa Lugi’s Pasta
Papa Lugi’s Pasta on Main Street has opened in the old waterworks building, formerly home to Maryland Yards. If you have not yet had the opportunity to stop in and partake of their offerings please do so. Everyone I spoke with who have eaten there raves about the food. Don and Mary Hart and their staff will be happy to welcome you into their restaurant. They are open from 4 pm to 10 pm Tuesday through Friday and from 11 am to 10 pm on Saturdays and Sundays. Plans are in the making to enlarge their deck, which they say, is already the largest deck at a restaurant in St. Charles.
Free Flicks
Historic Frenchtown is in their second year of providing free outdoor movies. They are presenting them on the fourth Friday of each month at the park on North Second Street.
New Town at St. Charles is offering outdoor movies every Friday evening at the New Town amphitheater. Rudy’s Ribs is the place to go in New Town on Friday evenings for popcorn and soda to enjoy with the movies. The movies are Free in both locations.
Indoor Volleyball Leagues at the Rec-Plex
If you can bump, set and spike, bring your volleyball skills to the St. Peters Rec-Plex and have fun in a competitive league this summer.
Women’s and Coed Competitive Volleyball Leagues are available at the Rec-Plex for players with better than average skills. Women’s Volleyball Leagues meet on Monday evenings beginning June 26. Coed Volleyball Leagues meet Wednesday evenings beginning June 28. An A/BB division (more highly skilled) and B division is available for both Women’s and Coed leagues.
The cost is $240 per team with each league needing a minimum of five teams to begin. To register or to learn more, call 636.939.2FUN or go online to stpetersmo.net and search Rec-Connect.
Summer Schedule
We will now be on our summer publishing schedule. During the months of June, July and August the First Capitol News will be published twice a month. Usually on the first and third Saturday. We will return to our weekly publication on September 9. In the meantime, you can follow breaking stories on our daily web log, firstcapitolnews-today.blogspot.com.
THE CITY DESK - Rory Riddler, Councilman Ward 1
Candidates Buried In Flood
Of Special Interest Surveys
In my real work (you know, that thing we all do in our spare time) I often work with candidates running for State or Federal office for the first time. Invariably one of the first questions I’m asked is, “What do I do with all these surveys I’m getting in the mail?”
One of the ways special interest groups like to let candidates know more about them and their agenda is by sending out questionnaires. These can be the first step on the road of receiving the endorsement and financial backing of the organization. They can also be a little intimidating.
Take the 2006 Missouri Candidate Survey of the Missouri Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee:
Question one: “Do you favor maintaining a licensed three-tier distribution system for beer?”
Hmmm? I had been thinking of a four-tier system.
The chances are most first time candidates running for a seat in the Missouri General Assembly have given absolutely no thought whatsoever to their position on maintaining a licensed three-tier beer distribution system. It probably isn’t on their top ten reasons I chose to run for office list. Nor probably are any of the other eighteen questions Missouri’s Beer Wholesalers were keen to know.
My personal favorite was question sixteen: “Would you support increasing the public awareness of the positive benefits of moderate consumption of malt beverage?”
Let’s see…Answer: Yes. That doesn’t sound positive enough and the beer wholesalers probably have a lot of money in their PAC fund. How about, “Yes and I would personally volunteer for any scientific studies of beer consumption you may care to conduct at the State Capitol.” That’s better.
Among the dozens and dozens of surveys candidates receive, most are from legitimate groups like the National Federation of Small Business, the Missouri National Education Association, the United Auto Workers, etc. But some leave you scratching your head if they are any more than a post office box at Sam Druker’s Store in Hooterville.
Here’s a good one from The Constitutional Coalition. That should be an easy one. After all, who’s not for the Constitution.
Question one: “Free people are not equal, and equal people are not free. Do you agree, disagree or are undecided?”
Huh? Did they get that off a bumper strip somewhere?
Question five: “If you encourage or subsidize something, you get more of it; if you discourage or tax something, you get less of it.”
Agree, disagree or undecided? I thought I took the SAT in high school.
Twenty-two mind numbing questions later…the final question. “What newspapers do you read?”
That’s great. The group screens candidates by what newspapers they read. I wonder if the First Amendment got left off their copy of the Constitution. Let’s put down the Denver Post and Boston Herald. That should keep them guessing for a while.
Most aren’t this hard to figure out. They want candidates to know their position on the issues. The Missouri State Teachers Association even enclosed a policy statement giving their positions on the questions being asked. It is sort of like taking an open book test.
Did I mention that some of these surveys come with their own curse like King Tut’s Tomb or a chain letter of some sort. Here’s one example:
“We will consider a no-response an indication that you do not want friends and neighbors to know what you think and believe.”
How about considering it an indication you can go to #@**. I better erase that.
Some groups are better off if they stick with the subjects they know the most about. There is a group called the Gun Owners of America, who must think the NRA isn’t doing a good enough job. Most of their survey dealt with different types of guns and ammo they think should be legal. What you would expect the group to be concerned with.
But question 12 C asked if the candidate agreed or disagreed that we shouldn’t increase Federal penalties for “violent” criminals. Where did that come from? I’m not sure the “violent criminal” lobby needs any more help.
The Missouri Chamber of Commerce mailed out one of the longest surveys this year. It contained a total of 38 questions for candidates to answer. One question asked about removing the loss limits for gamblers on Missouri’s casinos and another about keeping the number of gambling licenses at the current level. Both of these are big issues for Missouri’s gaming industry and apparently the Chamber of Commerce.
I thought that with all these special interest groups surveying candidates, that average voters should develop a survey to send to send to the special interest groups.
Question one: How much do you intend to spend trying to influence members of the Missouri General Assembly in the coming year?
Question two: Does anyone beside your “Executive Director of Governmental Affairs” ever read the hundreds of survey responses?
Question three: Why are the most profound and controversial issues always a yes or no answer?
Question four: What’s your favorite color?
They probably will say plaid.
Of Special Interest Surveys
In my real work (you know, that thing we all do in our spare time) I often work with candidates running for State or Federal office for the first time. Invariably one of the first questions I’m asked is, “What do I do with all these surveys I’m getting in the mail?”
One of the ways special interest groups like to let candidates know more about them and their agenda is by sending out questionnaires. These can be the first step on the road of receiving the endorsement and financial backing of the organization. They can also be a little intimidating.
Take the 2006 Missouri Candidate Survey of the Missouri Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee:
Question one: “Do you favor maintaining a licensed three-tier distribution system for beer?”
Hmmm? I had been thinking of a four-tier system.
The chances are most first time candidates running for a seat in the Missouri General Assembly have given absolutely no thought whatsoever to their position on maintaining a licensed three-tier beer distribution system. It probably isn’t on their top ten reasons I chose to run for office list. Nor probably are any of the other eighteen questions Missouri’s Beer Wholesalers were keen to know.
My personal favorite was question sixteen: “Would you support increasing the public awareness of the positive benefits of moderate consumption of malt beverage?”
Let’s see…Answer: Yes. That doesn’t sound positive enough and the beer wholesalers probably have a lot of money in their PAC fund. How about, “Yes and I would personally volunteer for any scientific studies of beer consumption you may care to conduct at the State Capitol.” That’s better.
Among the dozens and dozens of surveys candidates receive, most are from legitimate groups like the National Federation of Small Business, the Missouri National Education Association, the United Auto Workers, etc. But some leave you scratching your head if they are any more than a post office box at Sam Druker’s Store in Hooterville.
Here’s a good one from The Constitutional Coalition. That should be an easy one. After all, who’s not for the Constitution.
Question one: “Free people are not equal, and equal people are not free. Do you agree, disagree or are undecided?”
Huh? Did they get that off a bumper strip somewhere?
Question five: “If you encourage or subsidize something, you get more of it; if you discourage or tax something, you get less of it.”
Agree, disagree or undecided? I thought I took the SAT in high school.
Twenty-two mind numbing questions later…the final question. “What newspapers do you read?”
That’s great. The group screens candidates by what newspapers they read. I wonder if the First Amendment got left off their copy of the Constitution. Let’s put down the Denver Post and Boston Herald. That should keep them guessing for a while.
Most aren’t this hard to figure out. They want candidates to know their position on the issues. The Missouri State Teachers Association even enclosed a policy statement giving their positions on the questions being asked. It is sort of like taking an open book test.
Did I mention that some of these surveys come with their own curse like King Tut’s Tomb or a chain letter of some sort. Here’s one example:
“We will consider a no-response an indication that you do not want friends and neighbors to know what you think and believe.”
How about considering it an indication you can go to #@**. I better erase that.
Some groups are better off if they stick with the subjects they know the most about. There is a group called the Gun Owners of America, who must think the NRA isn’t doing a good enough job. Most of their survey dealt with different types of guns and ammo they think should be legal. What you would expect the group to be concerned with.
But question 12 C asked if the candidate agreed or disagreed that we shouldn’t increase Federal penalties for “violent” criminals. Where did that come from? I’m not sure the “violent criminal” lobby needs any more help.
The Missouri Chamber of Commerce mailed out one of the longest surveys this year. It contained a total of 38 questions for candidates to answer. One question asked about removing the loss limits for gamblers on Missouri’s casinos and another about keeping the number of gambling licenses at the current level. Both of these are big issues for Missouri’s gaming industry and apparently the Chamber of Commerce.
I thought that with all these special interest groups surveying candidates, that average voters should develop a survey to send to send to the special interest groups.
Question one: How much do you intend to spend trying to influence members of the Missouri General Assembly in the coming year?
Question two: Does anyone beside your “Executive Director of Governmental Affairs” ever read the hundreds of survey responses?
Question three: Why are the most profound and controversial issues always a yes or no answer?
Question four: What’s your favorite color?
They probably will say plaid.
CASE IN POINT By Joe Koester, Councilman Ward 9
Republicans approve of the American farmer, but they are willing to help him go broke. They stand four-square for the American home—but not for housing. They are strong for labor—but they are stronger for restricting labor’s rights. They favor minimum wage—the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all—but they won’t spend money for teachers or for schools. They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine— for people who can afford them. They consider electrical power a great blessing—but only when the private power companies get the rake-off. They think American standard of living is a fine thing—so long as it doesn’t spread to all the people. And they admire the Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it.
Harry Truman – Missouri’s President
Some things haven’t changed in all those years since Truman left office... This week, the newer, more Right-leaning Supreme Court decided that government employees who complain about official misconduct and get fired for it do not have the right to sue. This after the Court, in its wisdom, already limited a whistle-blower’s rights to sue for being fired! I guess this was just a follow up to make sure the message is nice and clear to Americans – your rights matter not if you work for the government. Mr. Bush took the opportunity during his reluctant creation of Homeland Security to swipe at workers’ rights by basically making any agent of that office an at-will employee. The very office where we would want the officials to know that they can step forward when there is misconduct by higher-ups and blow the whistle has been, instead, turned into a agency where making waves could get you fired in a hurry – first, because Mr. Bush’s Administration demanded you have no rights and, secondly, because Mr. Bush’s court has made sure to place the exclamation mark on this point. There has been much hay made lately about our courts ruling from the bench and I would have to agree in at least one instance: the 2004 election. The Supreme Court, which has no constitutional right to do so, intervened into the election results of the State of Florida. This was the first time in my lifetime that our nation’s president was chosen by court decision. The Court overstepped its bounds but from the Right, you heard no complaint about “ruling from the bench.”
You see, the ends justify the means for many who would otherwise complain bitterly if the courts decide against their issues.
In local matters, City Council will be bringing forth several charter-change issues in the weeks ahead and we will be asked to make the best decisions we can on each issue come November or April. Some of the matters are just a matter of cleaning up the language of the charter, while others will have broader consequences for our city.
Two issues in particular are noteworthy: form of City government and recall. Many on council believe that the issue of making our mayor fulltime was not fully discussed in public and narrowly passed with many believing that the Mayor’s hours would be the only significant change made by passing this matter. Now that everyone is better informed of the changes that will take place under the new form of government we can have open, public debate about what is best for our City. In the end, maybe the outcome will be the same; however, the public today is much better informed of what their vote will mean in 2007. Do you want an administrator form of government or a more political strong-mayor form of government? Hopefully, we all will be able to weigh both options in an issue that received little debate time the first time around.
Next, the matter of recall is being contemplated. One idea is to put the whole concept of recall before the public for a vote. Some on council believe that there is an anti-recall attitude among voters as made evident
by recent events. I disagree and think that the recent recall attempts were unsuccessful because of the disingenuous reasons given for recall, and the backers of the recall itself. I think most voters would like to have it as an option, but I believe that most voters would like to limit its scope to recall officials who have abused their office through malfeasance.
Recall due to malfeasance is a good compromise that allows citizens to take action against corruption but keeps political office from becoming an ongoing popularity contest that would render making tough decisions impossible because someone or some group is frustrated at a Councilman’s vote. Elections are the time to voice opinion, not every six weeks for three years.
Lastly, the Council did receive some recognition of a compromise reached in eminent domain. We really did make great strides in reaching out to all parties. And some say all we do is fight...
Harry Truman – Missouri’s President
Some things haven’t changed in all those years since Truman left office... This week, the newer, more Right-leaning Supreme Court decided that government employees who complain about official misconduct and get fired for it do not have the right to sue. This after the Court, in its wisdom, already limited a whistle-blower’s rights to sue for being fired! I guess this was just a follow up to make sure the message is nice and clear to Americans – your rights matter not if you work for the government. Mr. Bush took the opportunity during his reluctant creation of Homeland Security to swipe at workers’ rights by basically making any agent of that office an at-will employee. The very office where we would want the officials to know that they can step forward when there is misconduct by higher-ups and blow the whistle has been, instead, turned into a agency where making waves could get you fired in a hurry – first, because Mr. Bush’s Administration demanded you have no rights and, secondly, because Mr. Bush’s court has made sure to place the exclamation mark on this point. There has been much hay made lately about our courts ruling from the bench and I would have to agree in at least one instance: the 2004 election. The Supreme Court, which has no constitutional right to do so, intervened into the election results of the State of Florida. This was the first time in my lifetime that our nation’s president was chosen by court decision. The Court overstepped its bounds but from the Right, you heard no complaint about “ruling from the bench.”
You see, the ends justify the means for many who would otherwise complain bitterly if the courts decide against their issues.
In local matters, City Council will be bringing forth several charter-change issues in the weeks ahead and we will be asked to make the best decisions we can on each issue come November or April. Some of the matters are just a matter of cleaning up the language of the charter, while others will have broader consequences for our city.
Two issues in particular are noteworthy: form of City government and recall. Many on council believe that the issue of making our mayor fulltime was not fully discussed in public and narrowly passed with many believing that the Mayor’s hours would be the only significant change made by passing this matter. Now that everyone is better informed of the changes that will take place under the new form of government we can have open, public debate about what is best for our City. In the end, maybe the outcome will be the same; however, the public today is much better informed of what their vote will mean in 2007. Do you want an administrator form of government or a more political strong-mayor form of government? Hopefully, we all will be able to weigh both options in an issue that received little debate time the first time around.
Next, the matter of recall is being contemplated. One idea is to put the whole concept of recall before the public for a vote. Some on council believe that there is an anti-recall attitude among voters as made evident
by recent events. I disagree and think that the recent recall attempts were unsuccessful because of the disingenuous reasons given for recall, and the backers of the recall itself. I think most voters would like to have it as an option, but I believe that most voters would like to limit its scope to recall officials who have abused their office through malfeasance.
Recall due to malfeasance is a good compromise that allows citizens to take action against corruption but keeps political office from becoming an ongoing popularity contest that would render making tough decisions impossible because someone or some group is frustrated at a Councilman’s vote. Elections are the time to voice opinion, not every six weeks for three years.
Lastly, the Council did receive some recognition of a compromise reached in eminent domain. We really did make great strides in reaching out to all parties. And some say all we do is fight...
THE VIEW FROM THE CHEAP SEATS By Jerry Haferkamp
The View From The Cheap Seats
By Jerry Haferkamp
I have missed parts of the past several council meetings, so I’m not sure of the status of the future salary for our incoming mayor . I do know that the proposal by Councilman Hoepfner is in the range of $130,000. We all know “Battling Bob” as the fierce fighter to save taxpayer money. If that is the case, why in the world is he proposing a salary that exceeds that of our Missouri governor by 10%? The governor only makes $120,000, but of course, he is only the chief executive of a state, not Mayor of the “Center of the Universe”. Bob needs to get over his trip to Germany with the Mayor and come on back down to Earth with the rest of us mortals. I would like to see Bob turn his back on the Dark Side and come back to the Light.
For those of us who finally got street cracks filled, the company that did the work did an excellent job. I didn’t catch the full name, but MAC was on the truck door. They should get more city work if they continue to provide the same quality. I’m just glad that the mayor didn’t have another pet project to benefit South Main again this year and divert the funds to her friends down there like she did the last time our streets were to have cracks filled.
There is an apartment complex off Missouri Bottom Road that I’m sure the residents of St. Charles would like to see become mostly owner-occupied condos. Anyone who has visited the development knows that turning these upscale units into condos would be an asset. The owner should re-apply and the council should act in the best interests of our residents. We can’t let this be another money draining lawsuit. This place is becoming a lawyer’s paradise, and at least one judge is living an egotist’s dream. The council can’t let this issue get into his court.
A tip of the hat to our firemen and some of the service organizations in St. Charles. A duplex belonging to one of my sons caught fire last month. Although half of the ground level on one side was gutted, luckily no one was injured. The fire personnel did a great job. When I arrived 15 minutes after being notified by the tenant, gas workers had already shut off the gas. The Red Cross was already on the scene and had arranged for the tenants on both sides to have motel accommodations for the night, breakfast in the morning and access to clothing that didn’t reek of smoke. (Who could sleep when you knew the attached apartment next door could still have a glowing ember somewhere?) All this was accomplished within three hours of the discovery of the fire and was during the hours of 10:30 PM to 1:30 AM., literally in the middle of the night.
Thanks to all for a job truly “Well Done”. You were great.
As always, that’s the view from the cheap seats.
By Jerry Haferkamp
I have missed parts of the past several council meetings, so I’m not sure of the status of the future salary for our incoming mayor . I do know that the proposal by Councilman Hoepfner is in the range of $130,000. We all know “Battling Bob” as the fierce fighter to save taxpayer money. If that is the case, why in the world is he proposing a salary that exceeds that of our Missouri governor by 10%? The governor only makes $120,000, but of course, he is only the chief executive of a state, not Mayor of the “Center of the Universe”. Bob needs to get over his trip to Germany with the Mayor and come on back down to Earth with the rest of us mortals. I would like to see Bob turn his back on the Dark Side and come back to the Light.
For those of us who finally got street cracks filled, the company that did the work did an excellent job. I didn’t catch the full name, but MAC was on the truck door. They should get more city work if they continue to provide the same quality. I’m just glad that the mayor didn’t have another pet project to benefit South Main again this year and divert the funds to her friends down there like she did the last time our streets were to have cracks filled.
There is an apartment complex off Missouri Bottom Road that I’m sure the residents of St. Charles would like to see become mostly owner-occupied condos. Anyone who has visited the development knows that turning these upscale units into condos would be an asset. The owner should re-apply and the council should act in the best interests of our residents. We can’t let this be another money draining lawsuit. This place is becoming a lawyer’s paradise, and at least one judge is living an egotist’s dream. The council can’t let this issue get into his court.
A tip of the hat to our firemen and some of the service organizations in St. Charles. A duplex belonging to one of my sons caught fire last month. Although half of the ground level on one side was gutted, luckily no one was injured. The fire personnel did a great job. When I arrived 15 minutes after being notified by the tenant, gas workers had already shut off the gas. The Red Cross was already on the scene and had arranged for the tenants on both sides to have motel accommodations for the night, breakfast in the morning and access to clothing that didn’t reek of smoke. (Who could sleep when you knew the attached apartment next door could still have a glowing ember somewhere?) All this was accomplished within three hours of the discovery of the fire and was during the hours of 10:30 PM to 1:30 AM., literally in the middle of the night.
Thanks to all for a job truly “Well Done”. You were great.
As always, that’s the view from the cheap seats.
Bone Daddy & The Blues Shakers: Leaders of the Pack are going Footloose
Local R&B, Soul and Rock ‘n Roll band Bone Daddy & the Blues Shakers are the featured live band for Floodstage Productions musical, Footloose. This talented 5-man band thrilled audiences for Floodstage in last year’s smash production of Grease, and this year’s performances promises to be just as exciting.
All the music for Footloose is performed live, and includes the famous tunes from the movie-turned-musical like “Let’s Hear It For The Boy” and “Holding Out For A Hero” and of course, “Footloose”. For the show itself, Bone Daddy doubles as “The Country Kickers”, the bar band in the town that allows dancing. The band’s musical stylings will be expanded during intermission where the band will showcase a few other 80’s tunes, as well.
“Placing this band in a rock musical is a terrific blend of talents,” says Kevin Kurth, Musical Director for Footloose. “Live theater allows singers and musicians to deliver strong, tailored performances that showcase their very best work.” This is the second musical that Kurth has collaborated with Flood Stage Productions. His talents were also involved in last year’s production of Grease.
Bone Daddy and the Blues Shakers was founded about 8 years ago, and their local fandom has grown steadily over the years. They are regularly performing at ‘Party in the Park’ in Wapplehorst Park and ‘Music on Main’, twice monthly at Tuner’s on North Main Street, every couple of weeks or so in Alton’s entertainment district, and Binford’s on MidRivers Mall Drive in St. Peters. They have been a staple in the St. Louis Mardi Gras Parade, throwing beads and live tunes through Soulard every spring. Bone Daddy will also be performing at the St. Louis Art Show in Clayton this fall.
Danny Balsamo is the lead singer and also plays a mean sax and flute. Steve Simpson plays keyboards. Rick Gibson plays the six-string lead guitar and vocals. Tim Jones is the bass player and has shared the stage with James Brown. Craig Percell is touted as the smooth percussive glue that oozes from his drumsticks.
And behind all this music on stage are families that that move equipment and vacations to let these talented guys bring entertainment to adoring fans. Every member of Bone Daddy and the Blues Shakers has expressed their gratitude for the support they receive from their families, friends and fans. They love what they do, and it shows.
Footloose performances are: Friday June 9 and Saturday June 10 at 8pm. Sunday June 11 at 3pm. Also Thursday, June 15, Friday, June 16 and Saturday June 17 at 8pm. All performances are at St. Charles High School on the main stage. Reservations can be made by calling 636-578-8301. Tickets are held at the door and are payable by cash or check. $15 per adult and $12 for students and seniors.
Bone Daddy’s schedule can be found at www.bluesshakers.info
All the music for Footloose is performed live, and includes the famous tunes from the movie-turned-musical like “Let’s Hear It For The Boy” and “Holding Out For A Hero” and of course, “Footloose”. For the show itself, Bone Daddy doubles as “The Country Kickers”, the bar band in the town that allows dancing. The band’s musical stylings will be expanded during intermission where the band will showcase a few other 80’s tunes, as well.
“Placing this band in a rock musical is a terrific blend of talents,” says Kevin Kurth, Musical Director for Footloose. “Live theater allows singers and musicians to deliver strong, tailored performances that showcase their very best work.” This is the second musical that Kurth has collaborated with Flood Stage Productions. His talents were also involved in last year’s production of Grease.
Bone Daddy and the Blues Shakers was founded about 8 years ago, and their local fandom has grown steadily over the years. They are regularly performing at ‘Party in the Park’ in Wapplehorst Park and ‘Music on Main’, twice monthly at Tuner’s on North Main Street, every couple of weeks or so in Alton’s entertainment district, and Binford’s on MidRivers Mall Drive in St. Peters. They have been a staple in the St. Louis Mardi Gras Parade, throwing beads and live tunes through Soulard every spring. Bone Daddy will also be performing at the St. Louis Art Show in Clayton this fall.
Danny Balsamo is the lead singer and also plays a mean sax and flute. Steve Simpson plays keyboards. Rick Gibson plays the six-string lead guitar and vocals. Tim Jones is the bass player and has shared the stage with James Brown. Craig Percell is touted as the smooth percussive glue that oozes from his drumsticks.
And behind all this music on stage are families that that move equipment and vacations to let these talented guys bring entertainment to adoring fans. Every member of Bone Daddy and the Blues Shakers has expressed their gratitude for the support they receive from their families, friends and fans. They love what they do, and it shows.
Footloose performances are: Friday June 9 and Saturday June 10 at 8pm. Sunday June 11 at 3pm. Also Thursday, June 15, Friday, June 16 and Saturday June 17 at 8pm. All performances are at St. Charles High School on the main stage. Reservations can be made by calling 636-578-8301. Tickets are held at the door and are payable by cash or check. $15 per adult and $12 for students and seniors.
Bone Daddy’s schedule can be found at www.bluesshakers.info
THE CONSERVATIVE FACTOR - Alex Spencer
Sometimes, the political world seems a lot like a soap opera. There are villains and heroes, and folks that seem to switch it around quite a bit. You can certainly find a program to fit the bill. It seems like The Young and the Restless have lost their Guiding Light as they fight with The Bold and the Beautiful. Certainly, Passions run high because we only have One Life to Live. Hey, it’s worth taking a look around As the World Turns during the Days of Our Lives. I know, I know…Enough already. I’ll concentrate on the drama and intrigue closer to home.
This year, the Daytime Emmy Awards would almost exclusively go to the actors (and the writers) in O’Fallon. Even though calmer heads prevailed after the election, it is still politics as usual out west, and things are in a bit of a mess.
In O’Fallon, the revolving door at City Hall is still revolving with more senior employees leaving (or being pushed out) every week. I can’t even remember all the high-profile (and mostly involuntary) departures by City Staff since Mayor Morrow was elected, but things really kicked into high gear when Lowery came on board. Even though the City Council (formerly known as the Board of Aldermen) has learned its lesson and toned down the bi-weekly drama during its meetings, the City Administrator is still aggressively cleaning house. Is Mayor Morrow calling the shots from 37,000 feet as she serves soda to travelers? Who Knows? Stay tuned for more.
Let’s not forget the firing of Police Chief Steve Talbott (which some folks tell me was the beginning of the end for Morrow’s Motley Crew).Talbott is suing the City and wants Hudson’s secret tapes, and the City attorney’s want Mrs. Talbott’s e-mails and other documents. One has to wonder what exactly the City attorneys are hoping to accomplish. I also wonder whether Randy Hudson’s tape collection will have an unfortunate encounter with a heavy-duty magnet. It will be hard to top the story lines in O’Fallon.
Over in St. Peters, it came as no big surprise when the Board elected Alderman Bruce Holt as President. As soon as Alderman Hawkins chose to step aside to end the latest distraction manufactured by the malcontent bunch, Holt seems like a good, non-controversial choice. I guess the squeaky wheel doesn’t get the oil in St. Peters, because Alderman Barclay was shouting from the treetops that it was his turn. He seems to have missed the fact that he holds a “political office” and that there is an election for Board President. Maybe in years past, the Board agreed that a certain member would make a good President and that member may have been the next most senior, but it was not followed all that rigidly so I’m told. I think many of you folks in St. Peters would have been amazed if Barclay had secured one additional vote other than his own for President since Barclay is ignored and wholly ineffective. [Note to Barclay: If you are going to “duck” every single semi-controversial vote that comes your way, then there is no chance you’ll ever accomplish anything as an elected official. See, the people sent you there to make tough decisions, not to vote no on budget proposals because you don’t want to be held accountable during your election or abstaining because your political “sugar daddy” commands you to. You might want to think that over as you aspire to higher office. The issues can be even more controversial in the big leagues.] I guess St. Peters won another TIF lawsuit. Good for them. Things seem to have calmed down in the House of Brown, Shawn Brown that is.
Ironically, things seem somewhat stable in St. Charles. The make-up of the council remains the same notwithstanding the Herculean efforts of Mayor Patty and her cohorts. Chief Tim Swope finishes a productive first year on the job. On a less than stellar note, City Administrator Allan Williams remains in his position because of a technicality. The Missouri Ethics Commission has given Darling Dottie a relatively clean bill of health, and criminal charges are pending against at least one of the paid signature bounty hunters who sought to oust her. The city seems to have settled in for a long, hot summer. There is a potential for change 2007, although conventional wisdom says people tend to resist change unless there is some sort of issue relating to their basic services. If the trash is getting picked up and the roads are in okay condition, then things have a way of working themselves out. I know that I notice less voters when the weather is bad. So, maybe incumbents will do a “rain dance” next year, any maybe it won’t matter.
And, across the river, in St. Charles East (a.k.a. Overland), the Mayor is still the Mayor and the Police Chief is still the Police Chief. I guess that’s a draw. The sore loser is still making noises about the vote tally, even though the Mayor picked up a vote in the recount. You would think that the Mayor would be able to discuss the matter reasonably with her legislative counterparts, but alas, the folks in St. Charles East seem to be unwilling to recognize that the voters have spoken. It’s just a parallel universe, since here in St. Charles West, it’s our very own Perilous Patty who can’t seem to come to grips with the decision of the people.
Soap operas (like political productions) are serialized dramas that draw the viewer into relatively simple (although sensational) story lines involving interesting, multi-layered characters. Some are good and some are bad, but most seem to switch back and forth. Who needs Soapnet, when public access is still part of the basic package? If you catch up on your soaps, you might try the government channel. It will probably suffice as your soap fix for the day.
This year, the Daytime Emmy Awards would almost exclusively go to the actors (and the writers) in O’Fallon. Even though calmer heads prevailed after the election, it is still politics as usual out west, and things are in a bit of a mess.
In O’Fallon, the revolving door at City Hall is still revolving with more senior employees leaving (or being pushed out) every week. I can’t even remember all the high-profile (and mostly involuntary) departures by City Staff since Mayor Morrow was elected, but things really kicked into high gear when Lowery came on board. Even though the City Council (formerly known as the Board of Aldermen) has learned its lesson and toned down the bi-weekly drama during its meetings, the City Administrator is still aggressively cleaning house. Is Mayor Morrow calling the shots from 37,000 feet as she serves soda to travelers? Who Knows? Stay tuned for more.
Let’s not forget the firing of Police Chief Steve Talbott (which some folks tell me was the beginning of the end for Morrow’s Motley Crew).Talbott is suing the City and wants Hudson’s secret tapes, and the City attorney’s want Mrs. Talbott’s e-mails and other documents. One has to wonder what exactly the City attorneys are hoping to accomplish. I also wonder whether Randy Hudson’s tape collection will have an unfortunate encounter with a heavy-duty magnet. It will be hard to top the story lines in O’Fallon.
Over in St. Peters, it came as no big surprise when the Board elected Alderman Bruce Holt as President. As soon as Alderman Hawkins chose to step aside to end the latest distraction manufactured by the malcontent bunch, Holt seems like a good, non-controversial choice. I guess the squeaky wheel doesn’t get the oil in St. Peters, because Alderman Barclay was shouting from the treetops that it was his turn. He seems to have missed the fact that he holds a “political office” and that there is an election for Board President. Maybe in years past, the Board agreed that a certain member would make a good President and that member may have been the next most senior, but it was not followed all that rigidly so I’m told. I think many of you folks in St. Peters would have been amazed if Barclay had secured one additional vote other than his own for President since Barclay is ignored and wholly ineffective. [Note to Barclay: If you are going to “duck” every single semi-controversial vote that comes your way, then there is no chance you’ll ever accomplish anything as an elected official. See, the people sent you there to make tough decisions, not to vote no on budget proposals because you don’t want to be held accountable during your election or abstaining because your political “sugar daddy” commands you to. You might want to think that over as you aspire to higher office. The issues can be even more controversial in the big leagues.] I guess St. Peters won another TIF lawsuit. Good for them. Things seem to have calmed down in the House of Brown, Shawn Brown that is.
Ironically, things seem somewhat stable in St. Charles. The make-up of the council remains the same notwithstanding the Herculean efforts of Mayor Patty and her cohorts. Chief Tim Swope finishes a productive first year on the job. On a less than stellar note, City Administrator Allan Williams remains in his position because of a technicality. The Missouri Ethics Commission has given Darling Dottie a relatively clean bill of health, and criminal charges are pending against at least one of the paid signature bounty hunters who sought to oust her. The city seems to have settled in for a long, hot summer. There is a potential for change 2007, although conventional wisdom says people tend to resist change unless there is some sort of issue relating to their basic services. If the trash is getting picked up and the roads are in okay condition, then things have a way of working themselves out. I know that I notice less voters when the weather is bad. So, maybe incumbents will do a “rain dance” next year, any maybe it won’t matter.
And, across the river, in St. Charles East (a.k.a. Overland), the Mayor is still the Mayor and the Police Chief is still the Police Chief. I guess that’s a draw. The sore loser is still making noises about the vote tally, even though the Mayor picked up a vote in the recount. You would think that the Mayor would be able to discuss the matter reasonably with her legislative counterparts, but alas, the folks in St. Charles East seem to be unwilling to recognize that the voters have spoken. It’s just a parallel universe, since here in St. Charles West, it’s our very own Perilous Patty who can’t seem to come to grips with the decision of the people.
Soap operas (like political productions) are serialized dramas that draw the viewer into relatively simple (although sensational) story lines involving interesting, multi-layered characters. Some are good and some are bad, but most seem to switch back and forth. Who needs Soapnet, when public access is still part of the basic package? If you catch up on your soaps, you might try the government channel. It will probably suffice as your soap fix for the day.
First Capitol Counseling Connection - Dr Howard Rosenthal
Seven Habits of highly successful dog owners!
I have received a number of questions about handling inappropriate dog behavior. I must admit that am totally unqualified to answer such questions especially in light of the fact that my family’s newly acquired puppy, Katie, was the most ill behaved dog during her initial puppy training class!
Thus, in an attempt to rectify my own difficulties and meet my readers’ needs I have decided to interview Kara Sinclair, a St. Charles resident and dog behavior enthusiast at Kersting Bird Medicine and Surgery in Chesterfield.
HR: Maybe the term dog town should be applied to St. Charles. When I attend my son’s baseball games I see more dogs on leashes than I do kids on the field.
K: I think it’s great! Dogs need to be a part of everyday activities. Even if it’s just sitting at a child’s sporting event. Who wouldn’t want a little fresh air?
HR: When and how did you personally become interested in dogs?
K: I’m sure if you asked my parents they would say as soon as I could speak! Our household didn’t include any dogs as I was growing up. My sister and I felt lucky enough to have goldfish and hermit crabs as pets. Reading books on dog breeds and training made me want a dog even more. When I finally got a place of my own I was excited to add “Sprinkles” my Dalmatian to my life.
HR: Okay, first things first. Let’s say a family decides to add a dog to the household. What factors should be considered in terms of the dog’s age and breed?
K: My biggest pet peeve is when parents let their children pick out the dog or puppy for the family. The children should have a say but parents need to do their homework. As far as age is concerned puppies are a lot of work! They are little bundles of excitement and everything they encounter is a learning experience. Older dogs can without a doubt be a great addition to a family, especially if you have a little background information. Obedience classes are a must in my opinion. The bottom-line is that there are there are advantages and disadvantages with all breeds.
HR: I know you work with Dr. David Kersting, one of the leading bird vets. Do a lot of dog owners also have birds as pets? I’m not saying my family is typical, but we have five fine feathered friends in my home . . . or maybe we should be calling it the Rosenthal Aviary.
K: At the clinic we actually do have numerous families with a mix of pets in their homes. As long as people use common sense and supervise their animals, it can work.
HR: What’s the absolute dumbest thing that owners do in terms of trying to control their dog’s out of control behavior?
K: That would have to be ignoring bad behavior or making excuses for bad behavior. I can’t stand it when I hear, “I crate my dog when I have company because he jumps on people.” What’s that about? How will he ever learn acceptable behavior? Talk to an experienced trainer or at the least get a book on dog training.
HR: What are your suggestions for housebreaking a dog? My dog is about 11 weeks old. I take her outside and then the second I get in the house she decides to do her business. Outside of buying stock in a publicly traded carpet cleaning company do you have any suggestions?
K: I am a firm believer in crate training. All puppies need time to play and explore. But when play time is over the puppy should be crated when not supervised. To this day I still see my dog napping in her crate. As for your problem with Miss Katie, I would take small yummy treats outside with you .When she potties, she gets one. Remember this is not play time. Pick up toys in the yard so she won’t be tempted. Pick a word for her potty breaks and stick to it. If she doesn’t do her business, she goes back in the crate. Try again ten minutes later.
HR: Can you give our readers six or seven things that dog owners can do to help their animals behave in a more appropriate manner?
K: 1.Every breed has known quirks. If you are prepared and know how to address them, you’ll be on the right track. 2. Exercise is at the top of my list. A tired dog is a good dog. 3. Make dogs a part of your family! They are pack animals. 4. At times I may be guilty of this, but don’t treat your dog like a child. Dogs are dogs. 5. Make sure your dog is healthy. Yearly visits to the vet are an absolute must. 6. Love and appreciate your dog. 7. Keep learning about dogs. The more you learn, the better your relationship will be with your pets.
HR: At last, no more dog day afternoons. Are there any final gems of wisdom you’d like to impart to our fellow pet owners?
K: A trained, well-behaved dog is welcome anywhere. Just ask my dog “Sprinkles.”
HR: Thanks!
Dr. Howard Rosenthal is professor and program coordinator of Human Services at St. Louis Community College at Florissant Valley and a multi-book author. His titles include the Encyclopedia of Counseling and the Human Services Dictionary. His book Therapy’s Best: Practical Advice and Gems of Wisdom From Twenty Accomplished Counselors and Therapists will be released this summer. Dr. Rosenthal’s: website is www.howardrosenthal.com
I have received a number of questions about handling inappropriate dog behavior. I must admit that am totally unqualified to answer such questions especially in light of the fact that my family’s newly acquired puppy, Katie, was the most ill behaved dog during her initial puppy training class!
Thus, in an attempt to rectify my own difficulties and meet my readers’ needs I have decided to interview Kara Sinclair, a St. Charles resident and dog behavior enthusiast at Kersting Bird Medicine and Surgery in Chesterfield.
HR: Maybe the term dog town should be applied to St. Charles. When I attend my son’s baseball games I see more dogs on leashes than I do kids on the field.
K: I think it’s great! Dogs need to be a part of everyday activities. Even if it’s just sitting at a child’s sporting event. Who wouldn’t want a little fresh air?
HR: When and how did you personally become interested in dogs?
K: I’m sure if you asked my parents they would say as soon as I could speak! Our household didn’t include any dogs as I was growing up. My sister and I felt lucky enough to have goldfish and hermit crabs as pets. Reading books on dog breeds and training made me want a dog even more. When I finally got a place of my own I was excited to add “Sprinkles” my Dalmatian to my life.
HR: Okay, first things first. Let’s say a family decides to add a dog to the household. What factors should be considered in terms of the dog’s age and breed?
K: My biggest pet peeve is when parents let their children pick out the dog or puppy for the family. The children should have a say but parents need to do their homework. As far as age is concerned puppies are a lot of work! They are little bundles of excitement and everything they encounter is a learning experience. Older dogs can without a doubt be a great addition to a family, especially if you have a little background information. Obedience classes are a must in my opinion. The bottom-line is that there are there are advantages and disadvantages with all breeds.
HR: I know you work with Dr. David Kersting, one of the leading bird vets. Do a lot of dog owners also have birds as pets? I’m not saying my family is typical, but we have five fine feathered friends in my home . . . or maybe we should be calling it the Rosenthal Aviary.
K: At the clinic we actually do have numerous families with a mix of pets in their homes. As long as people use common sense and supervise their animals, it can work.
HR: What’s the absolute dumbest thing that owners do in terms of trying to control their dog’s out of control behavior?
K: That would have to be ignoring bad behavior or making excuses for bad behavior. I can’t stand it when I hear, “I crate my dog when I have company because he jumps on people.” What’s that about? How will he ever learn acceptable behavior? Talk to an experienced trainer or at the least get a book on dog training.
HR: What are your suggestions for housebreaking a dog? My dog is about 11 weeks old. I take her outside and then the second I get in the house she decides to do her business. Outside of buying stock in a publicly traded carpet cleaning company do you have any suggestions?
K: I am a firm believer in crate training. All puppies need time to play and explore. But when play time is over the puppy should be crated when not supervised. To this day I still see my dog napping in her crate. As for your problem with Miss Katie, I would take small yummy treats outside with you .When she potties, she gets one. Remember this is not play time. Pick up toys in the yard so she won’t be tempted. Pick a word for her potty breaks and stick to it. If she doesn’t do her business, she goes back in the crate. Try again ten minutes later.
HR: Can you give our readers six or seven things that dog owners can do to help their animals behave in a more appropriate manner?
K: 1.Every breed has known quirks. If you are prepared and know how to address them, you’ll be on the right track. 2. Exercise is at the top of my list. A tired dog is a good dog. 3. Make dogs a part of your family! They are pack animals. 4. At times I may be guilty of this, but don’t treat your dog like a child. Dogs are dogs. 5. Make sure your dog is healthy. Yearly visits to the vet are an absolute must. 6. Love and appreciate your dog. 7. Keep learning about dogs. The more you learn, the better your relationship will be with your pets.
HR: At last, no more dog day afternoons. Are there any final gems of wisdom you’d like to impart to our fellow pet owners?
K: A trained, well-behaved dog is welcome anywhere. Just ask my dog “Sprinkles.”
HR: Thanks!
Dr. Howard Rosenthal is professor and program coordinator of Human Services at St. Louis Community College at Florissant Valley and a multi-book author. His titles include the Encyclopedia of Counseling and the Human Services Dictionary. His book Therapy’s Best: Practical Advice and Gems of Wisdom From Twenty Accomplished Counselors and Therapists will be released this summer. Dr. Rosenthal’s: website is www.howardrosenthal.com
MAIN STREET FINANCIAL - Kevin Daniels, Vice President
If you own bonds, you had better understand bonds.
It seems like about once or twice a month I will get someone in my office that says they have invested in bonds, and only bonds, for forty years. And today of course, they would like to buy some bonds. Why bonds? Because, of course, bonds are what they have always bought.
Bonds can be a very serious part of any portfolio and can at times be a good fit for some folks. But if you own them, or have a fund that owns them, it might not be a bad idea to understand how they work. I find many clients understand one part of the bond very well, the interest payment, but pay little attention to the price of the bond.
There are two components to a bond: the interest payment and the selling price. The interest payment will come at some regular interval and will be a percentage of the bond. If a $10,000 bond pays 7%, then the interest would be $700 per year. The second component, the selling price of the bond, correlates to interest rates and can fluctuate a great deal. If sold this can add to or take away from that interest that is being earned.
Think of a see-saw when you were a kid. Imagine that on one side of the see-saw is interest rates and the other side is bond (selling) prices. As interest rates go down, bond prices go up. As interest rates go up, bond prices go down. This is called an inverse (see-saw) relationship. This inverse relationship is not true of every bond or every fund. There are many exceptions, but in general, this is the idea. “So what?”, you say. The “so what” is this: when a seventy-five year old client wants to purchase a bond that matures in thirty years (when they are 105 years old!) it is time to understand this inverse relationship! (Note that a 30-year bond could be far less than the par value or the face value if it is sold before 30 years.) I would finish this application, should he buy or not?
Now let’s look for a little application. Think of the economy today. Are interest rates generally high, low, or fairly average? If interest rates are very low, then bond selling prices will likely be adversely affected when interest rates rise. If interest rates are high right now then bonds will likely be selling at a discount. Not too tough right?
For those who elect not to watch so closely, there are blend funds which usually allow the fund managers to decide how many bonds to hold at any given time. If interest rates are historically low, look up a few blend funds, and you will probably see that the fund manager has bailed-out of his bonds and had a little profit taking which may indicate that he believes interest rates will soon rise. So if it is bonds that you seek, remember to look at BOTH components of the bond: the interest rate and the selling price.
PS. The longer the term of the bond (like thirty year) the more closely it will correspond to this see-saw guideline. And of course the shorter the bonding maturity, the less affected it will be by this guideline. And remember: bonds sell at the par or face value at maturity. Kevin Daniels is securities licensed through Investacorp, Inc. A registered broker/dealer Member NASD SIPC. For more information: 636-949-0999
It seems like about once or twice a month I will get someone in my office that says they have invested in bonds, and only bonds, for forty years. And today of course, they would like to buy some bonds. Why bonds? Because, of course, bonds are what they have always bought.
Bonds can be a very serious part of any portfolio and can at times be a good fit for some folks. But if you own them, or have a fund that owns them, it might not be a bad idea to understand how they work. I find many clients understand one part of the bond very well, the interest payment, but pay little attention to the price of the bond.
There are two components to a bond: the interest payment and the selling price. The interest payment will come at some regular interval and will be a percentage of the bond. If a $10,000 bond pays 7%, then the interest would be $700 per year. The second component, the selling price of the bond, correlates to interest rates and can fluctuate a great deal. If sold this can add to or take away from that interest that is being earned.
Think of a see-saw when you were a kid. Imagine that on one side of the see-saw is interest rates and the other side is bond (selling) prices. As interest rates go down, bond prices go up. As interest rates go up, bond prices go down. This is called an inverse (see-saw) relationship. This inverse relationship is not true of every bond or every fund. There are many exceptions, but in general, this is the idea. “So what?”, you say. The “so what” is this: when a seventy-five year old client wants to purchase a bond that matures in thirty years (when they are 105 years old!) it is time to understand this inverse relationship! (Note that a 30-year bond could be far less than the par value or the face value if it is sold before 30 years.) I would finish this application, should he buy or not?
Now let’s look for a little application. Think of the economy today. Are interest rates generally high, low, or fairly average? If interest rates are very low, then bond selling prices will likely be adversely affected when interest rates rise. If interest rates are high right now then bonds will likely be selling at a discount. Not too tough right?
For those who elect not to watch so closely, there are blend funds which usually allow the fund managers to decide how many bonds to hold at any given time. If interest rates are historically low, look up a few blend funds, and you will probably see that the fund manager has bailed-out of his bonds and had a little profit taking which may indicate that he believes interest rates will soon rise. So if it is bonds that you seek, remember to look at BOTH components of the bond: the interest rate and the selling price.
PS. The longer the term of the bond (like thirty year) the more closely it will correspond to this see-saw guideline. And of course the shorter the bonding maturity, the less affected it will be by this guideline. And remember: bonds sell at the par or face value at maturity. Kevin Daniels is securities licensed through Investacorp, Inc. A registered broker/dealer Member NASD SIPC. For more information: 636-949-0999
SPORTS - First Capitol News - Mike McMurran Sports Editor
MY COLUMN Mike McMurran First Capitol News Sports Editor
Never in this column have I written about my family. “What?” Some of you will surely say, “that’s all you ever write about. Its suppose to be a sports column, not ‘Family McMurran’s weekly adventure.’” Well, as I often say, its all relative.
By now any regular reader of this column know of and about Maggie, Joe and Dee. Occasionally I can even find a fine word to say about my wife of almost 14 years. On the few occasions I have spoken about cousins of my children, they have always, and I literally mean always from my wife of almost 14 years side of the family. No, without going into any detail at all, I was raised in a textbook dysfunctional family. There are no family birthday parties, no Mother’s day gatherings, not even a Christmas gathering. All those things I complain about my wife of almost 14 years family, who gather to celebrate wind direction change, in deep reflection I say to myself, “without them, I would have no family at all.” Such is almost certainly the reason I am so close to my children. No, on my side of the family there is no extended family…except for one! And that one is something special.
There lives in Indiana a young man to whom I have been saying I love you to longer than anyone on earth. He is my first born nephew, Thomas Stephen McMurran. Tom and I have been separated by hundreds of miles for years. There was even a period of time when we didn’t get the chance to talk to each other very often. Some three or four years ago when Tom was married to his lovely wife Kelli, we all jumped into the family van and drove to Indy for the wedding. It was one of the best times of my life. As Tom put it, even though he and I were not always afforded the chance to stay in touch, once we vowed never again to become separated, it was like we were always together. Smart kid, very smart kid. Although he is not really a kid, he will by 30 this September. Anyway, many people say Tom looks more like me than my own children, a point I have discussed with my wife of almost 14 years. Now, I am sure my critics, Greg Almus and Don Oelklaus complain the most of how I write too damn much about my family, are spitting fire, but hold on boys, here comes the sports hook.
In this week’s Sports Section of the FCN you will find an article or two written by my nephew, Tom McMurran. You see he too love to write, and usually it is about sports. He knows of what I do here with my little ole column, and checks it out weekly on the web. Recently he sent me a couple of narratives to look at and comment on. My comment was this: “Have we your permission to print this in our newspaper? This is good stuff.” And it is.
What he has written would best be described as a co-op piece dealing with the steroid issue in baseball. I am not certain that I agree with him, frankly I kinda disagree. But that does not take away from his ability to string together a sentence.
Great job Tom, I really mean it. Just think kid, you could grow up and be like your uncle. I’ve been writing now for this great weekly for over a year and a half, and from I can gather I have a loyal readership of some 26 fans. None, and I mean none, are more important to me than the one who reads the articles over the web from Indy.
FOOTBALL CONNECTICUT'S WAY
Tom McMurran
According to the Associated Press, the football committee of the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference is adapting a “score management” policy. The policy will suspend the coach of a team that wins by 50 or more points.
The committee rejected a proposal that many states have adapted that calls for a running clock in the 2nd half in games where the point margin is 35 points or greater. Committee members felt that this would cut into playing time for the back-ups.
Athletics teaches kids more than the fundamentals about a particular sport. In every sport that is played there are life lessons to be learned as well. Athletics teaches kids discipline, teamwork, how to deal with failure and most importantly teaches kids to keep working and not to give up. This “score management” policy only teaches kids to give up.
What is the committee’s recommendation for keeping the score under 50 points? Is the winning team supposed to take a knee on every snap or just punt? Is the defense to just let the other team score? These sound like great ways to get back-up players quality playing time, don’t they?
Suspending a coach of a team that wins by 50+ points is the least of my concerns.
The kids on the losing team are going to be more embarrassed with a team “taking it easy” on them. Does the committee think these kids are going to feel self-pride because they scored a touchdown on a defense that fell down on the snap of the ball? The policy is giving the message to kids that later in life when you are struggling, that everything will be okay because somebody is going to roll over so that you can have a little success.
I would think that there would be more injuries on the football fields in Connecticut next season. This policy is going to dictate that the leading teams not play hard. We have heard it many times before that if you don’t give it 100% you are more apt to get injured. Did the committee think about the health of these kids when approving this policy?
Football games get out of control every so often. Sometimes a 60-point win is just going to happen. A superior team gets a couple of turnovers and turns them into touchdowns and a 20 point lead quickly turns into a 34 point lead. In the 2nd half, the coach wants to get his back-ups some playing time. He coaches with sportsmanship and runs the ball to run the clock out. Oops, his back-ups are able to score against the other teams back-ups and the final margin of victory is 50 points. Suspend the coach, he is running up the score. No he isn’t, he is playing the game of football. Suspending a coach for playing the game the right way is unfair. I’m all for suspending a coach who is up by “x” amount of points and is calling timeouts and still throwing the ball. That is unsportsmanlike and is attempting to run up the score.
Nobody wants to see a high school football team get blown out, but that fact is that it is going to happen. Putting rules in place to keep them to a minimum is fine. Putting rules into place that teaches kids to quit playing hard and to disregard everything that they have been taught about football and work ethic is just plain wrong.
This is football not match play golf. In football you play, you don’t quit or concede or play at half speed.
ONLY IN BASEBALL
By Tom McMurran
It is time for society to lose the “everybody in baseball is on steroids” attitude. Over the last week, we have heard the whispers that Albert Pujols has to be taking steroids or if nothing else he is putting something illegal in his body. Why? Is it because he is the best player in the game? Is it because he is off to a record setting pace? Not totally. The reason is because he is off to a record setting pace in BASEBALL.
The closer Pujols gets to the home run record (73) the louder the whispers will become. Pujols will have the likes of Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, and Sammy Sosa to thank for the criticism that he receives during his run at history. Unfortunately for Pujols and others that make record-breaking runs in the near future they are not going to be able to enjoy the spotlight they are in. Because they play the game of BASEBALL, players that possess the talent and ability to break records will always be in a different light. The best players or record setters in other sports don’t have to deal with the ramifications of the players that came before them like baseball players do.
In 2004, Peyton Manning of the Indianapolis Colts chased down and passed Dan Marino’s record for touchdown passes in a single season. During Manning’s run at history, we were spared the topic of steroids. Why? The steroid issue was fresh off the press at the time of his record setting season. Yet, Manning wasn’t questioned about how he could throw the football into the end zone at such a blistering pace without using a drug to help him. Manning was treated like athletes should be treated when breaking records. The sports nation was excited and watched with anticipation for the record setting pass. Fans didn’t have to hear questions about steroids and performance enhancing drugs. Why? The reason, he doesn’t play the game of BASEBALL.
Baseball is clearly in a league of their own when it comes to great players, great performances steroids. In no other sport do players have their morals and integrity questioned like they do in baseball. If people are going to question Pujols for being such a great player and doing remarkable things in his profession, why aren’t we going to question other stars or players that dominate their sport?
How was Kobe Bryant able to perform at such a high level without the help of performance enhancing drugs? Bryant scored 81 points earlier this season in a single game. Bryant wasn’t questioned about if he had taken steroids to help him score so many points. He shouldn’t have been asked those types of questions either. He completed a remarkable feat, not a record but only beat by Wilt Chamberlain, and he was able to enjoy his performance and the attention he got from it. His accomplishment was recognized with the type of attention his performance deserved.
Tiger Woods has dominated the golf world for years. He has won more majors (10) than any other player currently on tour. He very well could win more majors than Jack Nicklaus (18) by the time he ends his career. Woods hasn’t been questioned about how he became so dominate. Tiger is in great shape and has muscles, which use to be unheard of for professional golfers, he is near the top in driving distance each year and nobody questions whether or not he is on steroids. Why? Tiger has great work ethic and he doesn’t play BASEBALL.
Albert Pujols like many other great athletes works extremely hard to get to where they are. Not all athletes that make it to the top are on steroids or any other type of performance enhancing drugs. Just because Pujols plays the game of BASEBALL he will be treated different than those great athletes that break records in other sports. Can you say “guilty by association”? Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa and the BALCO case has made it difficult for any player in baseball to chase a record without being scrutinized.
If Pujols is able to keep belting home runs throughout the season, the whispers we are hearing in May, will be childish screams in September.
Just let them play.
Tom is an aspiring free lance sports writer from Indianapolis. He lives with his wife Kelli.
Never in this column have I written about my family. “What?” Some of you will surely say, “that’s all you ever write about. Its suppose to be a sports column, not ‘Family McMurran’s weekly adventure.’” Well, as I often say, its all relative.
By now any regular reader of this column know of and about Maggie, Joe and Dee. Occasionally I can even find a fine word to say about my wife of almost 14 years. On the few occasions I have spoken about cousins of my children, they have always, and I literally mean always from my wife of almost 14 years side of the family. No, without going into any detail at all, I was raised in a textbook dysfunctional family. There are no family birthday parties, no Mother’s day gatherings, not even a Christmas gathering. All those things I complain about my wife of almost 14 years family, who gather to celebrate wind direction change, in deep reflection I say to myself, “without them, I would have no family at all.” Such is almost certainly the reason I am so close to my children. No, on my side of the family there is no extended family…except for one! And that one is something special.
There lives in Indiana a young man to whom I have been saying I love you to longer than anyone on earth. He is my first born nephew, Thomas Stephen McMurran. Tom and I have been separated by hundreds of miles for years. There was even a period of time when we didn’t get the chance to talk to each other very often. Some three or four years ago when Tom was married to his lovely wife Kelli, we all jumped into the family van and drove to Indy for the wedding. It was one of the best times of my life. As Tom put it, even though he and I were not always afforded the chance to stay in touch, once we vowed never again to become separated, it was like we were always together. Smart kid, very smart kid. Although he is not really a kid, he will by 30 this September. Anyway, many people say Tom looks more like me than my own children, a point I have discussed with my wife of almost 14 years. Now, I am sure my critics, Greg Almus and Don Oelklaus complain the most of how I write too damn much about my family, are spitting fire, but hold on boys, here comes the sports hook.
In this week’s Sports Section of the FCN you will find an article or two written by my nephew, Tom McMurran. You see he too love to write, and usually it is about sports. He knows of what I do here with my little ole column, and checks it out weekly on the web. Recently he sent me a couple of narratives to look at and comment on. My comment was this: “Have we your permission to print this in our newspaper? This is good stuff.” And it is.
What he has written would best be described as a co-op piece dealing with the steroid issue in baseball. I am not certain that I agree with him, frankly I kinda disagree. But that does not take away from his ability to string together a sentence.
Great job Tom, I really mean it. Just think kid, you could grow up and be like your uncle. I’ve been writing now for this great weekly for over a year and a half, and from I can gather I have a loyal readership of some 26 fans. None, and I mean none, are more important to me than the one who reads the articles over the web from Indy.
FOOTBALL CONNECTICUT'S WAY
Tom McMurran
According to the Associated Press, the football committee of the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference is adapting a “score management” policy. The policy will suspend the coach of a team that wins by 50 or more points.
The committee rejected a proposal that many states have adapted that calls for a running clock in the 2nd half in games where the point margin is 35 points or greater. Committee members felt that this would cut into playing time for the back-ups.
Athletics teaches kids more than the fundamentals about a particular sport. In every sport that is played there are life lessons to be learned as well. Athletics teaches kids discipline, teamwork, how to deal with failure and most importantly teaches kids to keep working and not to give up. This “score management” policy only teaches kids to give up.
What is the committee’s recommendation for keeping the score under 50 points? Is the winning team supposed to take a knee on every snap or just punt? Is the defense to just let the other team score? These sound like great ways to get back-up players quality playing time, don’t they?
Suspending a coach of a team that wins by 50+ points is the least of my concerns.
The kids on the losing team are going to be more embarrassed with a team “taking it easy” on them. Does the committee think these kids are going to feel self-pride because they scored a touchdown on a defense that fell down on the snap of the ball? The policy is giving the message to kids that later in life when you are struggling, that everything will be okay because somebody is going to roll over so that you can have a little success.
I would think that there would be more injuries on the football fields in Connecticut next season. This policy is going to dictate that the leading teams not play hard. We have heard it many times before that if you don’t give it 100% you are more apt to get injured. Did the committee think about the health of these kids when approving this policy?
Football games get out of control every so often. Sometimes a 60-point win is just going to happen. A superior team gets a couple of turnovers and turns them into touchdowns and a 20 point lead quickly turns into a 34 point lead. In the 2nd half, the coach wants to get his back-ups some playing time. He coaches with sportsmanship and runs the ball to run the clock out. Oops, his back-ups are able to score against the other teams back-ups and the final margin of victory is 50 points. Suspend the coach, he is running up the score. No he isn’t, he is playing the game of football. Suspending a coach for playing the game the right way is unfair. I’m all for suspending a coach who is up by “x” amount of points and is calling timeouts and still throwing the ball. That is unsportsmanlike and is attempting to run up the score.
Nobody wants to see a high school football team get blown out, but that fact is that it is going to happen. Putting rules in place to keep them to a minimum is fine. Putting rules into place that teaches kids to quit playing hard and to disregard everything that they have been taught about football and work ethic is just plain wrong.
This is football not match play golf. In football you play, you don’t quit or concede or play at half speed.
ONLY IN BASEBALL
By Tom McMurran
It is time for society to lose the “everybody in baseball is on steroids” attitude. Over the last week, we have heard the whispers that Albert Pujols has to be taking steroids or if nothing else he is putting something illegal in his body. Why? Is it because he is the best player in the game? Is it because he is off to a record setting pace? Not totally. The reason is because he is off to a record setting pace in BASEBALL.
The closer Pujols gets to the home run record (73) the louder the whispers will become. Pujols will have the likes of Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, and Sammy Sosa to thank for the criticism that he receives during his run at history. Unfortunately for Pujols and others that make record-breaking runs in the near future they are not going to be able to enjoy the spotlight they are in. Because they play the game of BASEBALL, players that possess the talent and ability to break records will always be in a different light. The best players or record setters in other sports don’t have to deal with the ramifications of the players that came before them like baseball players do.
In 2004, Peyton Manning of the Indianapolis Colts chased down and passed Dan Marino’s record for touchdown passes in a single season. During Manning’s run at history, we were spared the topic of steroids. Why? The steroid issue was fresh off the press at the time of his record setting season. Yet, Manning wasn’t questioned about how he could throw the football into the end zone at such a blistering pace without using a drug to help him. Manning was treated like athletes should be treated when breaking records. The sports nation was excited and watched with anticipation for the record setting pass. Fans didn’t have to hear questions about steroids and performance enhancing drugs. Why? The reason, he doesn’t play the game of BASEBALL.
Baseball is clearly in a league of their own when it comes to great players, great performances steroids. In no other sport do players have their morals and integrity questioned like they do in baseball. If people are going to question Pujols for being such a great player and doing remarkable things in his profession, why aren’t we going to question other stars or players that dominate their sport?
How was Kobe Bryant able to perform at such a high level without the help of performance enhancing drugs? Bryant scored 81 points earlier this season in a single game. Bryant wasn’t questioned about if he had taken steroids to help him score so many points. He shouldn’t have been asked those types of questions either. He completed a remarkable feat, not a record but only beat by Wilt Chamberlain, and he was able to enjoy his performance and the attention he got from it. His accomplishment was recognized with the type of attention his performance deserved.
Tiger Woods has dominated the golf world for years. He has won more majors (10) than any other player currently on tour. He very well could win more majors than Jack Nicklaus (18) by the time he ends his career. Woods hasn’t been questioned about how he became so dominate. Tiger is in great shape and has muscles, which use to be unheard of for professional golfers, he is near the top in driving distance each year and nobody questions whether or not he is on steroids. Why? Tiger has great work ethic and he doesn’t play BASEBALL.
Albert Pujols like many other great athletes works extremely hard to get to where they are. Not all athletes that make it to the top are on steroids or any other type of performance enhancing drugs. Just because Pujols plays the game of BASEBALL he will be treated different than those great athletes that break records in other sports. Can you say “guilty by association”? Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa and the BALCO case has made it difficult for any player in baseball to chase a record without being scrutinized.
If Pujols is able to keep belting home runs throughout the season, the whispers we are hearing in May, will be childish screams in September.
Just let them play.
Tom is an aspiring free lance sports writer from Indianapolis. He lives with his wife Kelli.
THE PEOPLE SPEAK - Letters To The Editor
To The Editor,
So much has been in the news concerning the deaths of innocent Iraqi’s by angry Marines lately. Yes, it is an atrocity, yes Abu Ghraib was an atrocity and so is Guantanimo Bay. What we are not talking about is why? When these things happened in Vietnam the country was appalled as well, but do we understand what is happening to our men and women sent to these countries, not knowing how to handle the constant stress, the depression, the anger and the lack of training and the fact that their lives are in danger every second of every day? I’ve talked to many veterans and their families over the past couple of years and tried in vain to get someone to listen to the needs of these returning wounded, mentally and physically. Our President stands at memorials and says the sacrifice is worth it. Is it? Ask why we invaded this country instead of sending the amount of troops we have in Iraq to Afghanistan to fight the real attackers of America; who by the way are now taking that country back in attack after attack on the troops still fighting there? Ask why so many promising lives and futures have been taken from us, disabled, suffering brain damage and depression beyond belief? Ask why so many have been rushed through a training process, dropped in the middle of a battle that they are not ready for and then ask why these atrocities occur? Ask why this invasion of Iraq has now gone on longer than WWII with no end in sight and ask what exactly is the “War on Terror” and is there anyway it can ever be won? What have we done to these young men and women, how many more will be lost? We send them and when they completely snap, we prosecute them and imprison them or if they don’t snap from the terror and stress of doing the things they are doing and seeing, we bring them home and leave them without funds to support their families or themselves and put them through another extremely stressful time fighting to even get benefits. It is a sad commentary of what is happening when we turn ordinary farm workers, family men and women, young executives, teachers and college students into killing machines and then forget who they are and who sent them there. Who is it that should be held accountable?
~ Sandra Vago
Dear Editor,
After watching a replay of the St. Charles City Council meeting of 5/19 and hearing a taxpayer say he wanted to know when his sewer was going to get hooked up after being annexed and paying City taxes for six years I was really upset.
When TR Hughes can be involved in a “secret society” that told people running for Council who did not see eye to eye with them to leave by the basement door. Remember!
When TR saw he wasn’t going to get his way with the Council concerning St. Andrews sewer hook up he found someone “stupid” enough to start an advertising supplement to ridicule some Council members he did not like and to force a fraud implemented recall election on Councilwoman Dottie Greer to try to get another vote for his project. He also went to State Rep Tom Dempsey and had Dempsey force through the legislature a bill in one day that would allow him to hook up his County sewers to the City system. Then up jumps Mr. Sellenschueter and says me too! – Me too! I got to get my hook `ups too and my development is not in your city and I didn’t build according to your building codes either.
Mr. Sellenschuetter says I’ll just use some of our good judges to rule against the City and get my development finished. Maybe somewhere down the line the taxpayers of the City will pay for the building codes and creek bank problems that are bound to happen but it will be after this place gets annexed into the City.
A couple of questions for each and every one of us to get answered as taxpayers.
When the state auditor finds there are some problems concerning our bidding procedures and contract awarding I would suggest she forward her findings to Mr. Jack Banas and he can do his job. If not Mr. Banas then Mr. Jay Nixon will be okay.
When I see what has taken place with the old County administration building and the way the bid was handled and the grant money handled to fix it up and the finished project and who the owner is and is now leasing space to the City fire department using our tax money to help finance private development on property that abuts our City Hall there is something radically wrong with this picture. (If not maybe a little bit illegal.) Same thing with the old police station. Remember!
Remember our top cop! Remember his lawsuit. Remember Mayor Patti re-opening the contact for the police. Remember! The threatening phone calls. Remember! The 73 officers who filed suit in court. Remember the executive orders put forth by Patti to try to put the FCN out of business. Remember Express Scripts. Remember the plywood in the window on Patti and Lionel’s building that was left there for a year. Remember Patti’s lawsuit against Mr. Zeisler. Remember Patti’s hearing on the Express Script deal and how Muench, Weller, Kneemiller, Reese and Hoepfner stopped the legal process by voting against the subpoenas that would have given us the truth. Remember Mr. Kast, Mr. Elmendorf, Father Tillman, Ken Kielty, TR, Jamboretz starting a legal defense fund for Patti to cover up the truth. Oops Ernie gets credit for “in kind service” for the use of his business, Pio’s to raise money for Patti’s legal work. Remember $25,000. Remember the FCN reporting and documenting the procedure the Mayor and Jamboretz apparently used through some of his (Jamboretz’s) employees and fictitious companies to apparently launder our money to be used for the recall of Dottie and Mark. Remember Henry and his participation in Patti’s re-election campaign and how the letterhead from the Church was used to promote her election. Remember!
Remember Henry said in his political ad for Patti – “Patti gets things done.”
She sure does get things done and I don’t know if all she has gotten done or been a part of getting it done is all legal. There are people in our local, County and State government that should be looking into some of these situations and or allegations as I see them.
Bob Bredensteiner
So much has been in the news concerning the deaths of innocent Iraqi’s by angry Marines lately. Yes, it is an atrocity, yes Abu Ghraib was an atrocity and so is Guantanimo Bay. What we are not talking about is why? When these things happened in Vietnam the country was appalled as well, but do we understand what is happening to our men and women sent to these countries, not knowing how to handle the constant stress, the depression, the anger and the lack of training and the fact that their lives are in danger every second of every day? I’ve talked to many veterans and their families over the past couple of years and tried in vain to get someone to listen to the needs of these returning wounded, mentally and physically. Our President stands at memorials and says the sacrifice is worth it. Is it? Ask why we invaded this country instead of sending the amount of troops we have in Iraq to Afghanistan to fight the real attackers of America; who by the way are now taking that country back in attack after attack on the troops still fighting there? Ask why so many promising lives and futures have been taken from us, disabled, suffering brain damage and depression beyond belief? Ask why so many have been rushed through a training process, dropped in the middle of a battle that they are not ready for and then ask why these atrocities occur? Ask why this invasion of Iraq has now gone on longer than WWII with no end in sight and ask what exactly is the “War on Terror” and is there anyway it can ever be won? What have we done to these young men and women, how many more will be lost? We send them and when they completely snap, we prosecute them and imprison them or if they don’t snap from the terror and stress of doing the things they are doing and seeing, we bring them home and leave them without funds to support their families or themselves and put them through another extremely stressful time fighting to even get benefits. It is a sad commentary of what is happening when we turn ordinary farm workers, family men and women, young executives, teachers and college students into killing machines and then forget who they are and who sent them there. Who is it that should be held accountable?
~ Sandra Vago
Dear Editor,
After watching a replay of the St. Charles City Council meeting of 5/19 and hearing a taxpayer say he wanted to know when his sewer was going to get hooked up after being annexed and paying City taxes for six years I was really upset.
When TR Hughes can be involved in a “secret society” that told people running for Council who did not see eye to eye with them to leave by the basement door. Remember!
When TR saw he wasn’t going to get his way with the Council concerning St. Andrews sewer hook up he found someone “stupid” enough to start an advertising supplement to ridicule some Council members he did not like and to force a fraud implemented recall election on Councilwoman Dottie Greer to try to get another vote for his project. He also went to State Rep Tom Dempsey and had Dempsey force through the legislature a bill in one day that would allow him to hook up his County sewers to the City system. Then up jumps Mr. Sellenschueter and says me too! – Me too! I got to get my hook `ups too and my development is not in your city and I didn’t build according to your building codes either.
Mr. Sellenschuetter says I’ll just use some of our good judges to rule against the City and get my development finished. Maybe somewhere down the line the taxpayers of the City will pay for the building codes and creek bank problems that are bound to happen but it will be after this place gets annexed into the City.
A couple of questions for each and every one of us to get answered as taxpayers.
When the state auditor finds there are some problems concerning our bidding procedures and contract awarding I would suggest she forward her findings to Mr. Jack Banas and he can do his job. If not Mr. Banas then Mr. Jay Nixon will be okay.
When I see what has taken place with the old County administration building and the way the bid was handled and the grant money handled to fix it up and the finished project and who the owner is and is now leasing space to the City fire department using our tax money to help finance private development on property that abuts our City Hall there is something radically wrong with this picture. (If not maybe a little bit illegal.) Same thing with the old police station. Remember!
Remember our top cop! Remember his lawsuit. Remember Mayor Patti re-opening the contact for the police. Remember! The threatening phone calls. Remember! The 73 officers who filed suit in court. Remember the executive orders put forth by Patti to try to put the FCN out of business. Remember Express Scripts. Remember the plywood in the window on Patti and Lionel’s building that was left there for a year. Remember Patti’s lawsuit against Mr. Zeisler. Remember Patti’s hearing on the Express Script deal and how Muench, Weller, Kneemiller, Reese and Hoepfner stopped the legal process by voting against the subpoenas that would have given us the truth. Remember Mr. Kast, Mr. Elmendorf, Father Tillman, Ken Kielty, TR, Jamboretz starting a legal defense fund for Patti to cover up the truth. Oops Ernie gets credit for “in kind service” for the use of his business, Pio’s to raise money for Patti’s legal work. Remember $25,000. Remember the FCN reporting and documenting the procedure the Mayor and Jamboretz apparently used through some of his (Jamboretz’s) employees and fictitious companies to apparently launder our money to be used for the recall of Dottie and Mark. Remember Henry and his participation in Patti’s re-election campaign and how the letterhead from the Church was used to promote her election. Remember!
Remember Henry said in his political ad for Patti – “Patti gets things done.”
She sure does get things done and I don’t know if all she has gotten done or been a part of getting it done is all legal. There are people in our local, County and State government that should be looking into some of these situations and or allegations as I see them.
Bob Bredensteiner
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)